InfraVeritas360DPDPiq

DPDP Insights › IT, ITeS, BPO and GCC › CIO / IT head

IT, ITeS, BPO and GCC

DPDP for the CIO / IT head in IT and ITeS

Your internal systems hold your staff data; your delivery platforms hold your clients'.

Open this seat in the interactive tool

What is different here

HRMS, ATS, payroll and collaboration tools are often global SaaS. Delivery platforms, code repositories and ticketing tools carry client data in screenshots, logs and attachments.

The first four things to sort out

  1. List internal systems with staff data and where they are hosted.
  2. Stop client data landing in your own ticketing and chat tools.
  3. Mask data in test and demo environments.
  4. Set deletion at project end.

A worked example: Client screenshots pile up in your ticketing tool

  1. Week 1An audit finds 40,000 tickets with screenshots showing client customer data.
  2. Week 2A masking rule and an attachment expiry are added.
  3. Week 4Old attachments older than the project need are purged.
  4. AfterTeams use the client's own tools for data-bearing tickets.

Evidence kept: Audit finding; Rule change; Purge record.

Your internal tools quietly collect client data.

What others in the sector usually do. Firms are adding a project-closure step that deletes client data from internal tools and laptops.

Where it usually goes wrong, by organisation type

Organisation typeHotspots
IT services and consultingProduction data copied to laptops or test environments; Shared client credentials in team chats; Sub-contractors working under your client access
BPO and contact centreCard numbers spoken on recorded calls; Phones and paper on the floor; Outbound calls without consent checks for Indian customers
Global capability centreIndian customer data mixed into global data sets; Global HR systems hosted abroad; Intra-group agreements that predate DPDP
SaaS and software productsSupport staff browsing customer tenants; Analytics on customer data beyond the contract; Deletion that does not reach backups
Managed services, data centres and cloudPrivileged admin access across many clients; Subscriber records kept with no access limits; Backups of client systems held for years

Control map: DPDP to NIST CSF 2.0 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022

DPDP dutyLawNIST CSF 2.0ISO/IEC 27001 Annex AEvidence
Know where personal data isSection 8(5) · Rule 6ID.AM-02, ID.AM-075.9, 5.12Inventory of systems and data types, with owner and hosting location
Only the right people get inSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.AA-01, PR.AA-055.15, 5.16, 5.18, 8.2Role matrix, quarterly access review sign-off, leaver removal report
Strong sign-in for admins and remote usersSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.AA-035.17, 8.5MFA enforcement report for admin, VPN and email accounts
Encrypt or mask dataSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.DS-01, PR.DS-028.11, 8.24Encryption settings for databases, laptops, backups and transfers; masking in test copies
Keep and watch logsSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.PS-04, DE.CM-01, DE.CM-038.15, 8.16, 8.17Log retention settings (one year; 180 days in India for CERT-In), alert rules, NTP source
Backups that restoreSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.DS-11, RC.RP-038.13, 5.30Backup schedule, offline copy, last restore test with date and result
Separate networksSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.IR-018.20, 8.22Network diagram showing segments, firewall rule review
Patch and fix weaknessesSection 8(5) · Rule 6ID.RA-018.8Vulnerability scan results and closure tracker
Handle incidents and tell peopleSection 8(6) · Rule 7RS.MA-01, RS.CO-02, RS.CO-035.24, 5.25, 5.26, 6.8Incident plan with the 6-hour and 72-hour steps, drill record, contact list
Learn from incidentsSection 8(6) · Rule 7DE.AE-02, ID.IM-015.27, 5.28Post-incident review and actions closed
Vendors protect data tooSection 8(1)–(2)GV.SC-05, GV.SC-075.19, 5.20, 5.22Contracts with data terms, vendor review record
Data comes back or is deleted at contract endSection 8(7) · Rule 8GV.SC-105.20, 8.10Exit clause and deletion certificate from the vendor
Cloud is set up safelySection 16 · Rule 15GV.SC-05, PR.DS-015.23Cloud region list, shared-responsibility note, configuration review
Delete when the purpose is overSection 8(7) · Rule 8PR.DS-018.10, 7.14Retention schedule, deletion log, disposal certificates for disks and paper
People know the rulesSection 8(5) · Rule 6PR.AT-016.3Training attendance and short test results by department
Legal duties are trackedSection 8(5) · Rule 6GV.OC-035.31, 5.34Register of laws and rules that apply, reviewed yearly
Roles are namedSection 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14GV.RR-025.2, 5.4Named owners for each system and each duty, approved by management

Logs, backups and access checklist

9 guides for the CIO / IT head, in full

How should our people access client systems?

Short answer: Named, logged and removed at roll-off

Through named accounts, from managed devices or controlled jump servers, with multi-factor sign-in and logging. Access should be removed the day someone rolls off. Client data should stay in client systems and not be copied to laptops, internal tickets or chat.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Fund jump servers or VDI for sensitive clients.
What the law says

Section 8(5) and Rule 6 apply to your safeguards even where you are the processor. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. No shared client credentials.
  2. MFA on all client access.
  3. Jump servers or VDI for sensitive clients.
  4. Roll-off removal the same day.
  5. Quarterly access review per client.
Evidence to keep
  • Access lists per client
  • Review records
  • Roll-off removal reports
Common mistakes
  • Shared logins in team chat
  • Copying production data to laptops
  • Access left after roll-off
Related questions

Does DPDP apply to data of foreign clients' customers?

Short answer: Mostly exempt for offshore data; security still applies

Mostly not. Section 17(1)(d) exempts processing of personal data of people outside India when you do it under a contract with a party outside India. Security safeguards and responsibility for your processors still apply. The exemption does not cover your Indian staff, Indian customers, or Indian data mixed into the same work.

What the law says

Section 17(1)(d) sets the exemption. Section 8(5) and 8(1) still apply. Section 17(1)(d) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. Tag each project by where the people live.
  2. Find mixed projects with Indian data.
  3. Keep security controls the same for all.
  4. Record which contracts rely on the exemption.
  5. Review when projects change.
Evidence to keep
  • Project tagging
  • Contract list
Common mistakes
  • Assuming all client work is exempt
  • Lower security for exempt data
  • Missing Indian data in global data sets
Related questions

Where does personal data live in our organisation?

Short answer: Start with one row per system

Usually in more places than anyone expects: core systems, email, shared drives, laptops, vendor systems, backups, test copies, spreadsheets and paper. A simple inventory, one row per system, is the base for every other duty.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Start from your application list and cloud bills. Each system needs an owner, a hosting location and a list of the vendors that touch it.
In IT and ITeS

Separate internal systems from client delivery platforms.

What the law says

Every duty in Sections 5 to 12 assumes you know where the data is. Rule 6 needs safeguards for each system, and Section 11 needs you to find the data when someone asks. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8

Steps
  1. List systems, then shared drives, email, spreadsheets and paper stores.
  2. For each one, note whose data, which items, purpose, owner, hosting location and vendors.
  3. Add copies: backups, test, analytics.
  4. Get each owner to confirm their rows.
  5. Update it whenever a system is bought or retired.
Evidence to keep
  • Data inventory
  • Owner confirmations
  • Change log
Common mistakes
  • A 200-column spreadsheet nobody finishes
  • Leaving out SaaS tools bought by departments
  • No owner for each row
Related questions

Can personal data be stored or accessed outside India?

Short answer: Yes, unless a sector rule says otherwise

Under DPDP, yes, unless the government restricts a country, and none had been restricted when this page was last reviewed. A sector rule can be stricter, for example RBI's rule that payment system data must be stored only in India. Remote support access from abroad also counts as data going outside India.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. SaaS tools bought by departments are the usual surprise. Ask Finance for the list of software subscriptions.
In IT and ITeS

Global HR and collaboration tools are often hosted abroad. Clients may restrict where their data goes.

What the law says

Section 16 allows transfers unless restricted, and keeps stricter sector laws in force. Rule 15 adds conditions on making data available to foreign states. Section 16 · Rule 15 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. List where each system is hosted and where support teams log in from.
  2. Check sector rules for localisation.
  3. Put location and access terms in cloud and vendor contracts.
  4. Keep the list current; new SaaS tools change it quietly.
  5. Tell people in your notice if data goes abroad.
Evidence to keep
  • Hosting and access-location list
  • Contract clauses
  • Sector rule check
Common mistakes
  • Forgetting email, CRM and helpdesk SaaS
  • Ignoring overseas support logins
  • Assuming 'Indian vendor' means 'data in India'
Related questions

Does deletion have to reach backups and test copies?

Short answer: Yes, through a written backup-expiry rule

Deletion should reach every copy you control. For backups, the usual practice is to let deleted records expire with the normal backup cycle, never restore them into live use, and write this down. Test and training copies should use masked data.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Deletion is an engineering task. Decide how each system deletes, how backups expire, and how test copies are masked.
In IT and ITeS

Client backups held by managed service teams must follow client retention.

What the law says

Section 8(7) asks for erasure. Rule 6 asks for backups for continuity. The two meet in a backup retention rule that is short enough and written down. Section 8(7) · Rule 8 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. List where copies live: backups, replicas, test, analytics, laptops, vendors.
  2. Set backup retention to match the retention schedule.
  3. Write a rule: deleted records are not restored into live systems.
  4. Mask personal data in test and training copies.
  5. Get deletion confirmations from vendors.
Evidence to keep
  • Backup retention settings
  • Written backup-expiry rule
  • Masking procedure for test data
Common mistakes
  • Ten-year backups for convenience
  • Live copies in test
  • Restoring old backups and bringing deleted records back
Related questions

Who should be able to see personal data in our systems?

Short answer: Only those who need it, reviewed every quarter

Only people who need it for their job, and only the part they need. Use named accounts, give access by role, review it every quarter and remove it on the day someone leaves. Watch privileged accounts closely.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Role-based access needs application changes as well as policy. Budget for it in the next release cycle.
In IT and ITeS

Your own HRMS and payroll, as well as client systems.

What the law says

Rule 6 names access control as a minimum safeguard, along with logs and monitoring that can detect misuse. Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Write a role matrix for each key system.
  2. Replace shared logins with named accounts.
  3. Use multi-factor sign-in for admin and remote access.
  4. Review access every quarter with each manager.
  5. Remove access on the last working day.
Evidence to keep
  • Role matrix
  • Quarterly review sign-offs
  • Leaver removal report
Common mistakes
  • Generic logins on shared machines
  • Access that only grows
  • No review of vendor accounts
Related questions

Which logs must we keep, for how long, and where?

Short answer: At least one year; 180 days of ICT logs in India

Keep logs that show who accessed personal data and what they did, for at least one year under the DPDP Rules. CERT-In separately asks for ICT system logs to be kept for 180 days within India. Logs must be protected so nobody can quietly change them.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Make sure applications log who viewed a record, not only system errors. That is what a request or a breach review needs.
In IT and ITeS

Keep logs of access to client systems, as well as your own systems.

What the law says

Rule 6 lists logs and monitoring as a minimum safeguard. Rule 8(3) asks for logs to be kept for at least one year. The CERT-In Directions of 2022 ask for 180 days of ICT logs kept within India. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8

Steps
  1. List systems holding personal data and what each logs today.
  2. Turn on access logging where it is missing.
  3. Send logs to one protected store, with at least one year of retention.
  4. Keep a copy of ICT logs in India for at least 180 days.
  5. Sync clocks and review alerts every day.
Evidence to keep
  • Log source list
  • Retention settings
  • Alert review records
Common mistakes
  • Logging only failures, not who viewed a record
  • Logs stored on the same server they describe
  • Clocks out of sync, so timelines cannot be built
Related questions

What must a vendor contract say about personal data?

Short answer: Yes, every vendor that touches personal data

You stay responsible for what your vendors do with personal data. The contract should say what data they get, for what purpose, the security they must keep, how fast they must tell you about an incident, that sub-contractors need your approval, and how data is returned or deleted at the end.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Your architecture decisions decide which vendors see data. Prefer designs that send vendors only what they need.
In IT and ITeS

Sub-contractors working on client data need the same terms you signed with the client.

What the law says

Section 8(1) keeps responsibility with you. Section 8(2) allows a processor only under a valid contract. Rule 6 asks for security terms in that contract. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8

Steps
  1. List vendors who receive or can see personal data.
  2. Rank them by how much and how sensitive.
  3. Add a data-protection schedule to each contract, starting with the top ten.
  4. Ask for evidence: certificates, test results, deletion confirmations.
  5. Review the top vendors every year.
Evidence to keep
  • Vendor register
  • Signed data-protection schedules
  • Annual review notes
Common mistakes
  • Relying on the vendor's standard terms
  • No incident-notice time
  • No exit and deletion clause
Related questions

Does ISO 27001 or NIST CSF cover our DPDP duties?

Short answer: They cover security, not the whole Act

They help a great deal with the security part. ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0 are good evidence of reasonable security safeguards. They do not cover notice, consent, rights, complaints or children's data. ISO/IEC 27701 adds privacy controls, but no certificate replaces the Act.

From your seat: CIO / IT head. Keep the mapping current as systems change. A new system without logging or access control undoes the work.
In IT and ITeS

ISO/IEC 27001 is common in the sector; ISO/IEC 27701 adds privacy controls clients ask for.

What the law says

Section 8(5) and Rule 6 ask for reasonable security safeguards. A recognised standard is strong evidence of that duty, and only of that duty. Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Map your current controls to Rule 6.
  2. Add the DPDP-only items: notice, consent, rights, complaints, children, retention.
  3. Use the same evidence for audits and for DPDP.
  4. Include privacy in the scope of your next internal audit.
  5. Consider ISO/IEC 27701 if clients ask for it.
Evidence to keep
  • Control map
  • Audit reports
  • Gap list for DPDP-only items
Common mistakes
  • Treating a certificate as DPDP compliance
  • Scope that leaves out the systems with the most personal data
  • No owner for the non-security duties
Related questions

Practical examples

Notice wording, request log, retention schedule, vendor clause and breach notice for it, ites, bpo and gcc.

The sections you will use most

Other rules that sit alongside DPDP

RuleWhat it saysWhat it means alongside DPDPSource
CERT-In Directions, 28 April 2022Report specified cyber incidents within six hours. Keep ICT logs for 180 days within India. Sync clocks to NIC or NPL time servers. Data centres, VPS, cloud and VPN providers keep specified subscriber information for five years.Breach handling must meet the six-hour CERT-In clock and the DPDP report to the Board. Subscriber records need DPDP-level protection.CERT-In
DPDP Act, Section 17(1)(d)Processing of data of people outside India, under a contract with a party outside India, is exempt from most of the Act.Tag each data set by where the people live. The exemption does not cover Indian staff or Indian customers.MeitY
IT Act, Section 43A and SPDI Rules, 2011Reasonable security practices for sensitive personal data, until Section 43A is omitted on 13 May 2027.Your current ISO 27001 practices meet these today; DPDP Rule 6 takes over from May 2027.MeitY
TRAI Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations, 2018Commercial calls and SMS to Indian numbers must follow registration and preference rules.Outbound campaigns for Indian clients need both DPDP consent and TRAI compliance.TRAI
Labour Codes (in force from 21 November 2025)The four labour codes replaced older labour laws, including registers and records employers must keep.Set retention for staff records against the new codes and state rules.Ministry of Labour
Client contracts and foreign laws (for example GDPR for EU clients)Clients often bind you to their own country's law through contracts and standard clauses.These are contract duties, not Indian law, but you must meet them alongside DPDP.Contract
Explore our research-built assessment platformsEach one comes out of the same InfraVeritas360 Foundation Layer research. Human-led, with no AI used.