What is DPDPiq · for the DPO / Management
An advanced DPDP assessment, built on governance-led intelligence research.
A note of thanks
Built through questions, discussions and different perspectives.
Thank you to every CIO, CTO, CISO, DPO, auditor and board member who questioned, challenged and piloted this research.
Over four and a half years, DPDPiq has grown out of more than 1,500 conversations with CIOs, CTOs, CISOs, DPOs, auditors and board members across 10+ countries: online discussions, direct conversations, personal meetings, comments, questions and independent feedback. Some of it supported our thinking, some questioned it, and some took us to areas we had not considered. All of it shaped how this version of DPDPiq was designed, redesigned and built.
We also thank the enterprises and individuals who showed interest in pilot assessments and pilot engagements on our research-led platforms: Foundation Check, DPDPiq and aiQ. Team InfraVeritas360 thanks everyone who has been part of this journey.
IBM Institute for Business Value commented on our DPDP research note, Beyond the Data Register: Can the Board Trust the Processing Reality?
Public (Institutional) Research Interaction on InfraVeritas360's LinkedIn posts during the Foundation Layer research. Public interactions are referenced as part of the research discourse and do not represent organisational endorsement, validation, partnership, sponsorship or commercial association.
Questions from our research
Your assessment answers are the most sensitive map you will ever hand over.
In a readiness assessment, your departments answer 120+ questions. Together, those answers show where your data flows, which systems hold it and where the gaps are. So it is worth asking:
- Where does that map live after the assessment?On your own server, or on the assessor's portal?
- Who else can see it?The vendor's team, their cloud provider, their sub-processors?
- Does it leave your network at all?Is every answer sent over the internet to an outside tool or API?
- Can you take it back?When it ends, can every answer, file and backup copy be deleted, and has anyone confirmed it?
- Are your weak points now someone else's record?The DNS issue, the backup location, the vendor without a contract.
Proven by design
Under the DPDP Act, 2023, the organisation stays responsible for personal data it shares with any processor. See constructs C4 and C5 in our Research.
Already proven in the field
This is DPDPiq: the advanced DPDP assessment platform, built on governance‑led intelligence research.
It shows the DPO / Management, in 3 to 5 working days, which parts of the DPDP position are proven, which are only stated, who owns each area, and what to fix first.
One assessment · value for every seat
Same facts. Each seat gets what it needs.
No scores. No AI or LLM. No access to your systems. Hosted, in-house or offline.
Six areas. 36 questions. One clear position.
36 questions in 6 areas, asked as a guided conversation. It shows what is backed by reviewed evidence and what is only a statement.
The assessment starts as a simple conversation.
One question at a time, with the reason it is asked. Every option explains what it means and what would prove it.
Invite the colleague who knows the answer.
Name, work email and role. Tick only the sections they need. They never see your dashboard.
Ask the right person, with the DPO copied.
When answers conflict, send one question with the reason. They reply on a secure page, with no login. Reminders go 2 days before and on the date.
Every area gets a named owner.
The DPO names an owner per area. The owner gets a plain email and accepts on their own page. No account needed.
Accepting means you keep this answer accurate, provide evidence and close open points.
Answer once. The dashboard updates in 7 seconds.
The moment an answer is confirmed, the DPDPiq engine reads it, updates the position, the analysis, the data flow and the plan. The DPO, the auditor and the implementation team all see the same picture, at the same time.
Every answer is analysed in plain words.
What the answer establishes, what it does not, the DPDP sections it touches, and a list of evidence that would settle it.
- Screenshots of the notice at each form
- Form-to-system routing record
- Tracker and tag configuration
Every file follows one review path.
Upload right from the analysis. Files are virus-scanned and encrypted. A position is established only when a professional review accepts the evidence.
The six-stage data flow map.
From the people the data is about to its deletion. Every box quotes an answer with its question ID. Points to resolve are marked in amber, in the organisation's own words.
1People and data
StatedWhose data · Q-1.12Collection
StatedCollected through · Q-1.43Systems
Stated1 to resolveHeld in · Q-3.14Sharing and access
Partly assessedProcessors · Q-3.35Storage
Stated3 to resolveHosted in · Q-3.26Retention and deletion
Partly assessedRetention set by · Q-4.5Three contradictions most assessments miss.
Two answers from the same organisation that cannot both be true are put side by side, with the one question that settles them.
Personal data stays in India only.Conflict found
Backups are kept outside India.
No external processor is involved.Conflict found
We use a SaaS platform and a bulk email service.
No third-party trackers are used.Conflict found
Google Analytics runs on our website.
Settle the points with an expert, then move on.
Topic cards are built from your own figures. Pick two. In the Meeting Room, what was discussed, agreed and pending is recorded, and agreed points are confirmed with a code.
Revise an answer any time. The old one stays on record.
Up to 2 changes per answer, each with a reason and a 6-digit code sent to the work email. Both versions are sealed in the SHA-256 ledger.
A 30/60/90-day plan built from real gaps only.
Each action comes from a contradiction, an unresolved point, or an evidence or owner gap in this assessment, with a finding, owner, target and what closes it.
Closes when: the contradiction no longer appears and the evidence is accepted.
DPO / Management sign-off, kept honest.
Sign-off records what Management accepts. It never turns pending evidence into verified facts. Downloads match the live dashboard.
Executive position, evidence maturity, key pointsPDF
One card per question, SHA-256 fingerprintPDF / image
All 36 questions, evidence, owners, statusExcel
Named, dated, versionedRecorded
Independent by design
We do not compete with auditors, GRC practices or system integrators. We work alongside them.
InfraVeritas360 is not a hardware supplier, software reseller, system integrator, implementation company, audit firm or certification body. DPDPiq gives everyone in the room the same evidence-based position, so each can do their own work better.
Human Intelligence. Independent by Design. Air-Gapped by Principle.An InfraVeritas360 Foundation Layer Governance research output. Human-led and evidence-focused. No AI or LLM is used or connected to determine assessment positions.
How each one gains
- No scores or badges
- No AI or LLM
- No access to your systems
- Hosted, in-house or offline
Dashboard · the data flow map
The six-stage data flow map, from the organisation's own answers.
No one draws this by hand. DPDPiq builds it from the answers your team gives, and it updates within 7 seconds of every confirmed answer. Click a point to see what it shows.
All six stages of the data flow are described; none is yet confirmed by evidence. Demo organisation, names blurred.
The real product
Screens from a live DPDPiq assessment.
Taken from a demo organisation in the product itself. Client names are blurred.
Sounds familiar?
Where most DPDP work gets stuck.
These come up again and again in conversations with DPOs, CISOs and auditors. DPDPiq is built around each of them.
IT says the data is in India. The backup contract says Singapore.DPDPiq puts the two answers side by side and asks the one question that settles it.
The questionnaire went to one person, who guessed the rest.Any question can go to the colleague who actually knows, with the DPO copied.
Management wants one clear page, not 150 answers.The DPO / Management report shows the position by area, in plain words.
The auditor asks for proof, not policies.Every answer carries its evidence, owner, version and a sealed record.
The DPDPiq standard
A checklist records what people say. DPDPiq checks what can be shown.
Both ask questions. Only one tells you which answers you can rely on.
A usual readiness checklist
120 to 150 items sent to one person
"Do you have a retention policy?"
Answers accepted as written
A percentage score
A report that is out of date next quarter
DPDPiq
36 questions, each routed to the person who knows
"Show that data is deleted at the end of its purpose"
Recorded, then established only with reviewed evidence
The position area by area, with a named owner
A baseline you can re-assess against, with every change on record
At the end of the assessment
What the DPO / Management takes away.
All of it is downloadable, and every figure traces back to a recorded answer.
What a checklist does not catch
Three contradictions most assessments miss.
Each pair below comes from the same organisation's own answers. A questionnaire records both and moves on. DPDPiq puts them side by side and asks the next question.
“Personal data stays in India only.”
“Backups are kept outside India.”
Backups, support access or SaaS tools often place data outside India without the DPO knowing.
“No external processor is involved.”
“We use a SaaS platform and a bulk email service.”
Teams think of vendors as tools, not as processors. The organisation stays accountable for them.
“No third-party trackers or analytics are used.”
“An analytics tool runs on our website.”
Analytics and advertising tags are usually added by marketing or an agency, outside the privacy process.
Six steps
From first answer to a signed-off plan.
The order matters. Owners are named before positions are drawn, and the plan comes only from gaps the assessment actually found.
Trust
Built so client data stays with the client.
Only position statements leave your boundary. The evidence itself stays where you keep it.
Runs hosted by InfraVeritas360, inside your own setup, or fully offline.
Fixed, version-controlled rules. No external AI service is called.
A one-time code for every sign-in and every sensitive change.
Virus scanning on upload and AES-256-GCM encryption at rest.
A fingerprint and a ledger entry for every answer and every change.
Client data is not shared with any outside party.
Working together
Supports the work of auditors, privacy experts and DPOs.
DPDPiq does not replace anyone in the room. It gives each of them the same facts, recorded the same way.
Auditors
- Statements, contradictions and owners organised before fieldwork
- Exact recorded answers with versions and SHA-256 checks
- Evidence register and Excel tracker with review status
- Can run inside the client's setup or offline
Audit and GRC firms
- All clients in one Control Centre, with the same figures each client sees
- Discussion guide and Meeting Room built from the client's answers
- Ask someone, secure replies and reminders
- Agreed points confirmed with a code, sealed and versioned
DPOs
- A plain-word position for management, without scores
- Named owners who accept responsibility themselves
- A 30/60/90-day plan tied to real findings
- Report and sign-off for the DPO / Management
How to start
Begin with the assessment. Add a discussion when you are ready.
One assessment covers one entity. Audit firms, GRC practices, system integrators and groups with many entities can see the partner packs under Pricing.
DPDPiq Assessment
Start with the core assessmentFull assessment, dashboard, data flow, 30-day plan, answer records and downloads.
Start assessmentGovernance Discussion
One online discussionThe client picks 2 topic cards from their own figures. Releases the 60 and 90-day plans.
See pricingGovernance Deep Dive
Two discussions and a follow-up14 days apart, all topics, requests to the team and evidence guidance.
See pricingMain DPDP obligations apply from May 2027.
Research behind DPDPiq
DPDPiq is an outcome of InfraVeritas360's Foundation Layer research, built from more than 1,500 conversations with CIOs, CTOs, CISOs, DPOs, auditors and board members across 10+ countries.
Public (Institutional) Research Interaction · IBM Institute for Business Value
“Who validates the complete journey? That is a question more boards should be asking.”
“AI readiness and AI adoption are not the same thing.”
Public interactions are referenced as part of the research discourse and do not represent organisational endorsement, validation, partnership, sponsorship or commercial association.
Questions DPOs and Management ask
DPDP and DPDPiq, answered.
Thirty questions in three groups. Each answer links to the page that goes deeper.
What it is, how it works and what you get
What is DPDPiq?
DPDPiq is an advanced DPDP assessment platform built on InfraVeritas360's governance-led intelligence research. It takes an organisation through 36 questions in six areas, records every answer exactly as given, and then shows the DPO / Management which parts of the DPDP position are backed by reviewed evidence and which are only statements. The result is a clear position by area, a data flow map, a list of contradictions and a 30/60/90-day plan built only from real gaps.
Start assessment →How is DPDPiq different from a readiness checklist?
A readiness checklist usually sends 120 or more questions to one person and accepts the answers as written. DPDPiq routes each question to the person who actually knows the answer, ties every answer to evidence, and treats a position as established only after that evidence is reviewed. It also places answers side by side, so contradictions such as data said to stay in India while backups sit outside India come to the surface early.
See how it works →How long does a DPDPiq assessment take?
A typical assessment takes three to five working days. The questions themselves are answered one at a time as a guided conversation, and most of the time goes into colleagues finding and sharing evidence. The dashboard updates within seven seconds of every confirmed answer, so the DPO / Management can see the position build up as the work moves forward.
Start assessment →What does the DPO / Management receive at the end?
At the end of the assessment the DPO / Management receives a position statement by area, an exposure register mapped to sections of the DPDP Act with an owner for each point, a six-stage data flow map, a list of contradictions with the question to settle each, a 30/60/90-day plan and a management report for sign-off. Answer records carry a SHA-256 fingerprint, and an evidence tracker is available in Excel.
See the real product screens →Why does DPDPiq not give a percentage score?
A single percentage needs weights that nobody states, and it can hide which duty is actually weak. An organisation with a higher score can be in a weaker legal position than one with a lower score. DPDPiq therefore shows the position area by area, with the evidence behind it and the owner accountable for it, so decisions are made on facts rather than on a number.
Read the research →What is the seven-second dashboard?
The moment an answer is confirmed, the DPDPiq engine reads it and updates the position, the analysis, the data flow map and the plan within seven seconds. The DPO, the auditor and the implementation team all see the same picture at the same time, without waiting for a report to be written. Every figure on the dashboard traces back to a recorded answer.
Start assessment →Can colleagues from other departments answer questions?
Yes. Any question can be sent to the colleague who knows the answer, for example IT for hosting and backups or Marketing for website tracking. They receive a plain email, answer on a secure page without creating an account, and the DPO is always copied. Each contributor sees only the sections assigned to them, and every reply is recorded with date and time.
See how it works →Can an answer be changed after the assessment is complete?
Yes. An answer can be revised up to two times, each time with a reason and a six-digit code sent to the work email. The earlier answer is never deleted. Both versions are sealed in the SHA-256 ledger, so auditors and Management can see what changed, when and why.
See how it works →How does DPDPiq build the 30/60/90-day plan?
Every action in the plan comes from a real gap found in the assessment: a contradiction, an unresolved point, a missing piece of evidence or an area without an owner. Each action carries the finding behind it, a priority, a suggested owner, a target date and the condition that closes it. Nothing is added to the plan that the assessment did not find.
Start assessment →Who is DPDPiq built for?
DPDPiq is built for the DPO / Management who must answer for the DPDP position, and for the people who work with them: CISOs, CIOs and CTOs, internal audit, audit and GRC firms, privacy practices and system integrators. Partners can run assessments for many clients from one Control Centre, with the same facts each client sees.
See pricing and partner packs →Questions DPOs and Management ask most
What is the DPDP Act, 2023?
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 is India's law on how organisations collect, use, share, store and delete digital personal data. It sets duties for Data Fiduciaries, gives rights to Data Principals, and is supported by the DPDP Rules, 2025. DPDP Insights explains what the Act means for each role and sector in plain words.
Read DPDP Insights →When do the main DPDP obligations apply?
The DPDP Rules, 2025 were notified in November 2025, with most obligations for Data Fiduciaries applying from May 2027. Organisations are using the time in between to map their data, fix notices and consent, put processor contracts in place and prepare for breach reporting. Starting early leaves room to collect evidence rather than only write policies.
Read DPDP Insights →Does the DPDP Act apply to our organisation?
The Act applies to the processing of digital personal data within India, and to processing outside India where it is linked to offering goods or services to people in India. Almost every organisation that holds customer, employee or vendor contact data is covered in some way. DPDP Insights shows how it applies to your sector and role.
Check how it applies →Do we need to appoint a Data Protection Officer?
A Data Protection Officer based in India is mandatory for a Significant Data Fiduciary. Other organisations must still publish the contact of a person who can answer questions about personal data. In practice, many organisations name a DPO or a privacy lead early, because someone has to own the position and the plan.
Read: do we need a DPO →What is a Significant Data Fiduciary?
A Significant Data Fiduciary is an organisation that the Government notifies as such, based on factors like the volume and sensitivity of personal data it processes and the risk to people. It has extra duties, including a DPO in India, periodic data protection impact assessments and an independent data audit.
Read: Significant Data Fiduciary →What must a privacy notice contain under DPDP?
A notice must tell the person, in clear and plain language, what personal data is collected, the specific purpose, how they can withdraw consent, how they can exercise their rights and how they can complain to the Data Protection Board. The notice should be shown at the point of collection, not after, and a record of what was shown should be kept.
Read: notices →How should consent be collected and withdrawn?
Consent must be freely given, specific, informed, unconditional and unambiguous, given through a clear affirmative action, and limited to the data needed for the stated purpose. Withdrawing consent must be as easy as giving it. Organisations should keep a record of each consent and each withdrawal, including when and how it happened.
Read: consent →What happens when there is a personal data breach?
Every personal data breach must be reported to the Data Protection Board and to each affected person, without delay. The DPDP Rules, 2025 add a more detailed report to the Board within 72 hours. Organisations need a tested way of knowing what happened, which data and people are involved, and who informs whom.
Read: breach reporting →How long can personal data be kept?
Personal data should be erased once the purpose is served and consent is withdrawn, unless a law requires it to be kept longer. Erasure has to reach backups, analytics copies and data held by processors, not only the main system. Many organisations first need a retention schedule by record type to make this possible.
Read: retention →Are we responsible for data held by our vendors?
Yes. The Data Fiduciary stays responsible for personal data it shares with any processor, including cloud, payroll, CRM and email providers. A valid contract with each processor, clear instructions and a way to confirm deletion are needed. DPDPiq brings vendor and processor answers together, so gaps in this chain are visible.
Read: processors →How DPDPiq keeps your data with you
Does InfraVeritas360 see our systems or data?
No. DPDPiq has no access to your systems at any stage. Only the answers and evidence your team chooses to record are held, and when DPDPiq is installed inside your infrastructure, even those stay within your own boundary. Only position statements leave it, and only if you share them.
Start assessment →Can DPDPiq run inside our own infrastructure?
Yes. DPDPiq can be installed on one PC or server in your premises and run without internet access. Only email codes and notifications go out. It can also be hosted by InfraVeritas360 or run fully offline, depending on how sensitive your environment is.
See pricing →Does DPDPiq use AI, LLMs or outside APIs?
No. DPDPiq is isolated by policy. It does not use or connect to any AI model, LLM, Google service or outside API to determine assessment positions. The engine works on fixed, version-controlled rules, and a human governance team reviews evidence and completes the assessment with you.
Read the research →How is evidence stored and protected?
Every uploaded file is virus-scanned and encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM. Each answer and each change gets a SHA-256 fingerprint and a ledger entry, so it can be shown later that nothing was altered. Sign-in and every sensitive change need a one-time code sent to the work email.
See how it works →Does DPDPiq certify that we are DPDP compliant?
No. DPDPiq does not certify compliance and is not legal advice. It gives the DPO / Management an honest, evidence-based position and a plan. It does not replace the independent data audit required for a Significant Data Fiduciary, and it supports the work of your auditors rather than standing in for it.
Read the limits →Do you compete with auditors or system integrators?
No. InfraVeritas360 is not a hardware supplier, software reseller, system integrator, implementation company, audit firm or certification body. DPDPiq gives everyone in the room the same evidence-based position, so auditors can focus on assurance and system integrators on implementation.
Talk to us →Can audit firms, GRC practices and system integrators partner with InfraVeritas360?
Yes. Partner packs let audit firms, GRC practices and system integrators run DPDPiq assessments for many clients from one Control Centre, with the same live figures each client sees, a discussion guide and a Meeting Room. Implementation, assurance and the client relationship stay with the partner.
See partner packs →What happens to our assessment data when the engagement ends?
When DPDPiq runs inside your infrastructure, the data never leaves it, so it stays under your own retention policy. When it is hosted, assessment data is kept only for the agreed period, and deletion can be requested, including evidence files and backups.
Talk to us →Do we need DPDPiq if we already have ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 cover information security controls well, but the DPDP Act adds duties that those standards do not fully test, such as notice and consent at the point of collection, rights requests, processor chains and erasure at end of purpose. DPDPiq checks these against evidence, and the control map helps reuse evidence you already have.
Start assessment →How do we get started?
Start the assessment from this page with your work email. The DPO begins with the organisation details and industry, then works through the questions, inviting colleagues where needed. You can also talk to us first on +91 98209 24360 or hello@infraveritas360.com.
Start assessment →We don't do compliance. We make you ready for it.
Start the assessment, or talk to us first.
How it works
What the client sees, and what happens behind it.
Five parts: the assessment, your team and evidence, the DPO / Management dashboard, the discussion, and the Control Centre for audit, GRC and SI partners.
The assessment starts as a simple conversation
One question at a time. People type or pick an answer, and nothing is filled in for them.
- 6 areas
- Data landscape · Notice and consent · Systems and processors · Security and lifecycle · Rights and grievances · Governance and assurance
- 36 questions
- Each with "why we ask this", what each option means, and what evidence would prove it
- Industry
- Paste an About-us description, or search over 500 industry choices
- Identity
- Official website domain, work email checked with a six-digit code, role and authorisation recorded
- Cycles
- Every assessment cycle has its own ID, so answers and evidence never mix
Your team and evidence, without logins
The DPO invites colleagues only to the parts they need. Invitees never see the client dashboard.
- Owners
- The DPO names an owner for each area. The owner gets a plain email and accepts on their own page. Acceptance is recorded with date and time.
- Ask someone
- A colleague gets one question by email, replies on a secure page, and can attach a file. The DPO is always copied.
- Changes
- Up to 2 changes per answer, each with a reason and an email code. The old answer stays on record.
After upload, every file follows one review path
Upload is not acceptance. A position is established only when a professional review accepts the evidence.
The DPO / Management dashboard
The dashboard opens with the organisation in plain words and updates with every answer.
- Position by area, with six figures and five plain lines: stated, established, uncertain, ownership, next
- Analysis of each answer: what it establishes, what it does not, and the related DPDP sections
- Data flow and departments: six stages traced from the organisation's own answers
- Four hand-offs that deserve the closest attention: collection, transfer, storage, closure
- Contradictions shown side by side, with the question to ask next
- Works on a phone too
Discussion and sign-off
Topics come from the client's own figures. Agreed points are confirmed with a code. The plan covers 30, 60 and 90 days, and the DPO / Management sign-off records what is accepted without turning pending evidence into verified facts.
Control Centre, for audit, GRC and SI partners
One work queue across all clients, a client portfolio with the same figures each client sees, a Client 360 page, a source of truth beside every question, a discussion guide, a Meeting Room, and an activity ledger you can show an auditor.
Research
The research DPDPiq is built on.
DPDPiq applies InfraVeritas360's Foundation Layer research to one statute, the DPDP Act, 2023. This tab keeps the method, the constructs and the reasoning in one place.
The measurement problem
Long questionnaires of 120 to 150 items collect self-reported descriptions of controls and treat them as evidence. Four failures follow.
- i.
- Respondent displacement. The form goes to the person who holds the form, not the one who holds the answer, so answers drift towards the average.
- ii.
- Construct drift. "Do you have a retention policy?" is not the same as confirming deletion at end of purpose.
- iii.
- Absent evidence linkage. Answers are not tied to artefacts, so intended and implemented controls look the same.
- iv.
- Non-repeatability. Different assessors or dates give different results, so there is no baseline.
Constructs under the DPDP Act, 2023
Each construct is checked against evidence, not assertion. C1 gates the others. C7 applies only to notified entities.
- C1
- Processing inventory: categories of data, systems, purpose, volume and business owner
- C2 · s. 5–7
- Lawful basis integrity: whether the basis and notice match the actual purpose
- C3 · s. 11–13
- Principal rights operability: access, correction, erasure and grievance within timelines
- C4 · s. 8(7)
- Retention and erasure, including backups, analytics copies and processor-held data
- C5 · s. 8(2), 16
- Processor and transfer chain, including sub-processors and cross-border transfers
- C6 · s. 8(6)
- Breach readiness, tested against a walked scenario rather than a plan document
- C7 · s. 10
- Significant Data Fiduciary set: impact assessment, independent audit and DPO, where notified
- SC
- Scope declaration: excluded entities, business lines and systems are recorded
Protocol
A fixed five-step sequence: scoping, distributed response, evidence binding, reconciliation, and position. Questions nobody can answer are escalated to a named colleague and logged, never estimated. Conflicting answers go to a named owner and stay unresolved until they are resolved, never averaged.
Collaboration room provenance
Inviting the person who holds the answer, rather than the form holder, removes the largest accuracy loss. Access is scoped, role-bound and verified with a one-time code. Each contribution is time-stamped with a signature that binds actor, time and file fingerprint.
Why there is no percentage score
A single percentage needs weights nobody states. In the example below, the lower score is the better statutory position.
DPDPiq reports the position per construct, where the exposure is concentrated, and who is accountable.
Limits
- Not legal advice on how the statute is interpreted
- Does not certify compliance
- No technical testing: no penetration tests, configuration scans or code review
- Does not discover data; it relies on what is disclosed
- Does not replace the independent audit required for Significant Data Fiduciaries
- Limited to the declared scope and the assessment window
Public (Institutional) Research Interaction
The IBM Institute for Business Value commented on three posts from the InfraVeritas360 LinkedIn page.
“Who validates the complete journey? That is a question more boards should be asking.”
“Better decisions upstream can create meaningful value downstream.”
“AI readiness and AI adoption are not the same thing.”
Public interactions are referenced as part of the research discourse and do not represent organisational endorsement, validation, partnership, sponsorship or commercial association.
Governance Research Notes
The research notes behind each construct cover processing reality, failure modes of dashboards and audit documentation, inventory and CMDB, retention and backup, least-privilege access, the processor chain and vendor risk, SIEM and network segmentation, investment avoidance and AI readiness.
Read the Governance Research Notes
IGaaS (Infrastructure Governance as a Service) is a pre-compliance practice across twelve governance domains and more than fifty frameworks, including ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, NIST CSF, CERT-In and DPDP.
Pricing
Access and pricing.
Choose who you are buying for and how you want DPDPiq deployed. Validity starts on activation. Hosted scope is confirmed after an environment review.
Single assessment
- One entity, full assessment and dashboard
- Data flow, plan, answer records and downloads
- Monthly AMC ₹15,000 to ₹60,000, by environment scope
Governance Discussion
- One online discussion on 2 topic cards
- Releases the 60 and 90-day plans
Governance Deep Dive
- Two discussions, 14 days apart, and a follow-up
- All topics, team requests and evidence guidance
20 assessments
- Multi-client workspace
- StatementStore 3.0 SHA-256 binding
- 18-Volume Master Dossier
- Zero cloud egress
- Priority support and practice management not included
50 assessments
- Everything in 20
- Priority support
- Practice management
Monthly Platform AMC for packs: ₹25,000 to ₹75,000. Hosted AMC is billed annually.