InfraVeritas360InfraVeritas360हिन्दीमराठीதமிழ்DPDPiq

DPDP Insights › Banking, financial services and insurance › Chief compliance officer

DPDP for the Chief compliance officer in BFSI

Reviewed by InfraVeritas360 ResearchFirst published Last reviewed

Sources: DPDP Act, 2023 and DPDP Rules, 2025 (MeitY) · RBI KYC Master Direction · RBI · RBI · RBI

Your compliance calendar already carries RBI, PMLA and CERT-In dates. DPDP adds duties owed to the customer, each needing an owner and evidence.

Written for: Chief compliance officer, Banking, financial services and insurance. Open this seat in the interactive tool

What is different here

Many DPDP duties overlap with what you already track, so the work is mapping, not starting again. Retention must respect PMLA and KYC periods, privacy complaints may reach both the RBI Ombudsman and the Data Protection Board, and one incident can carry three clocks. The truly new lines are notices, consent by purpose and customer requests.

The first four things to sort out

  1. Add each DPDP duty to the compliance register with an owner.
  2. Map retention against PMLA, KYC and sector rules.
  3. Keep one page with the CERT-In, RBI and DPDP clocks.
  4. Tag privacy complaints in one log that tracks the 90-day limit.

A worked example

Chief compliance officer

One register for the regulator and DPDP

  1. Week 1Compliance lists DPDP duties next to the existing RBI, PMLA and CERT-In items.
  2. Week 2Security, logging and outsourcing lines already have evidence from the last inspection. Notice, consent by purpose and customer requests have none.
  3. Week 4Owners are named for the open lines. The DPO attaches the notice versions and a consent-by-purpose report.
  4. MonthlyThe compliance report to the DPO / Management shows each DPDP line as tested, stated or open.

Evidence kept

  • Combined register
  • Evidence links
  • Monthly compliance report

Reuse regulator evidence where it fits, and say plainly which lines it does not cover.

What others in the sector usually do. Many compliance teams start by adding a DPDP column to the register they already keep for their regulator, and linking evidence they already hold.

Where it usually goes wrong, by organisation type

Organisation typeHotspots
Scheduled commercial bankCross-selling insurance and mutual funds on account terms; Business correspondent devices and paper forms in villages; Old core banking archives with no deletion path
Co-operative bank (urban or rural)Vendor-run core banking with admin access from the vendor's office; Member and share registers kept on open shelves; Directors and staff who are also members and relatives of borrowers
NBFC and digital lenderApps asking for contacts, photos and call logs; Collection agents sharing borrower details with family or employers; Leads bought from aggregators with no consent record
Insurance company (life, general or health)Medical reports passed to TPAs and hospitals by email; Agent and broker access to policyholder data; Claims data kept long after the claim is closed
Broking, depository and wealthAuthorised persons with client lists on personal phones; Research-tip calls to people who never consented; Client KYC copies shared over email with partners
Payments and fintechCard numbers in logs and support tickets; Merchant onboarding documents in shared drives; Fraud models that use data beyond what users were told

10 questions the Chief compliance officer asks, answered in full

Can we cross-sell insurance, cards or mutual funds to existing customers?

Short answer: Only with separate, specific consent

Only with specific consent for that purpose. Account opening terms do not count as consent to receive offers or to have data shared with a partner insurer or fund house. Service messages about the customer's own account are different and do not need marketing consent.

What the law says

Section 6 needs specific consent for each purpose. Section 5 needs a notice that names the purpose. Section 6 · Section 5 · Rule 3 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. Separate service messages from offers in your systems.
  2. Ask consent for offers and partner sharing separately, by channel.
  3. Record consent by purpose and partner.
  4. Check the record before each campaign.
  5. Pass withdrawals to partners the same day.
Evidence to keep
  • Consent records by purpose and partner
  • Campaign approval with consent check
  • Withdrawal logs
Common mistakes
  • Using account terms as consent
  • Partners calling from their own lists
  • Withdrawal not reaching partners

What can collection agents do with borrower data?

Short answer: Only what is needed, under your contract and RBI conduct rules

Collection agents act for you, so you are responsible for what they do. They should get only the data needed to contact the borrower, use it only for collection, and never share the debt with family, friends or employers. RBI's rules on recovery conduct, including calling hours, apply alongside DPDP.

What the law says

Section 8(1) and 8(2) make you responsible for processors. Section 8(5) needs safeguards. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 6

Steps
  1. Share only name, contact details and the amount due.
  2. Put data terms and conduct rules in every agency contract.
  3. Record calls and review a sample.
  4. Ban use of the borrower's phone contacts.
  5. Take back or delete data when the account closes.
Evidence to keep
  • Agency contracts
  • Call review records
  • Data return certificates
Common mistakes
  • Sending full loan files to agencies
  • Agents calling relatives
  • No deletion after the account closes

Who owns accountability for personal data in practice?

Short answer: Named owners, accepted by them, for each duty

The organisation is accountable under the Act, and management decides who answers for each duty inside it. In practice that means a named owner for each duty and each major system, written down and accepted by that person. An owner whose name was typed in by someone else, without their agreement, is not really an owner.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Name an owner for every duty in one register approved by management.
What the law says

Section 8(1) puts responsibility on the Data Fiduciary. Section 8(9) asks for a published contact person. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Section 10 · Rule 13

Steps
  1. List duties and major systems.
  2. Propose an owner for each.
  3. Ask each owner to accept in writing.
  4. Publish the overall contact person.
  5. Review owners when people move.
Evidence to keep
  • Owner register with acceptances
  • Published contact
  • Review dates
Common mistakes
  • Owners assigned without telling them
  • One person owning everything
  • Owners who left the organisation

Can a policy show that a control actually works?

Short answer: No; operation needs records

No. A policy shows what an organisation intends. It does not show that the control runs. To show operation you need records: a deletion log, an access review sign-off, a drill report, a sample of requests answered on time. Auditors and regulators look for these.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. A policy is a starting point. Ask for the record that shows it working.
What the law says

Section 8(4) asks for appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance. Being able to show those measures work is part of meeting that duty. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. For each policy, write the record that would show it working.
  2. Check whether that record exists for the last quarter.
  3. Where it does not, start producing it.
  4. Sample a few records every quarter.
  5. Keep the samples with the policy.
Evidence to keep
  • Policy-to-record map
  • Quarterly samples
  • Gaps and actions
Common mistakes
  • Approving policies with no record behind them
  • Showing a policy when asked for evidence
  • Records that exist only before an audit

What should our privacy notice say, and where must people see it?

Short answer: Yes, at every point where you collect data

A notice must tell people, in plain words, what data you collect, why, how they can withdraw consent, how they can use their rights and how they can complain to the Data Protection Board. It has to stand on its own, separate from long terms and conditions, and be shown at the point where data is collected.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Keep a version history of every notice.
Example in BFSI

A bank's account opening form, its mobile app sign-up and its loan application each need their own short notice, separate from the terms and conditions.

What the law says

Section 5 and Rule 3 ask for a notice that can be understood on its own, with an itemised list of the data and the purpose for each item. Data you already hold from before the Act also needs a notice, as soon as reasonably practicable. Section 5 · Rule 3 · Section 6 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14

Steps
  1. List every point where personal data comes in: forms, apps, counters, calls, emails, partner feeds.
  2. Write one short notice per collection point, with the data items and purpose side by side.
  3. Add how to withdraw consent, how to make a request and the DPO or contact person's details.
  4. Offer the notice in English and in the languages your customers actually use.
  5. Keep each version with the date it went live.
Evidence to keep
  • Screenshots or copies of the notice at each collection point, with dates
  • Notice version history
  • Translations, where used
Common mistakes
  • Hiding the notice inside terms and conditions
  • One notice for everything, with no link between data items and purposes
  • Forgetting old data collected before the Act

How do we handle a privacy complaint within 90 days?

Short answer: Reply within your published period, never beyond 90 days

Publish one clear way to complain, log every complaint, give it an owner and reply within the period you publish, never more than 90 days. People can go to the Data Protection Board only after using your process, so a good process keeps most matters with you.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Count the days on privacy complaints yourself.
Example in BFSI

A privacy complaint may also reach the RBI Ombudsman. One log, tagged for both, avoids two different answers.

What the law says

Section 8(10) requires a working grievance process. Rule 14(3) caps the reply time at 90 days. Section 13 says people must use your process before approaching the Board. Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Sections 18–26

Steps
  1. Publish one contact for privacy complaints on your website, app and notices.
  2. Log each complaint with the date, channel and a named owner.
  3. Acknowledge within a few days, and set an internal target well under 90 days.
  4. Find and fix the cause, not just the single case.
  5. Reply in writing and close the entry with the date.
Evidence to keep
  • Complaint register with dates
  • Replies sent
  • Monthly summary to management
Common mistakes
  • Mixing privacy complaints into general complaints with no tag
  • No owner, so nobody counts the days
  • Closing a complaint without fixing the cause

Something has gone wrong. What happens in the first 72 hours?

Short answer: Six hours for CERT-In; without delay for people and the Board; 72 hours for the detailed report

Contain it, then tell people. A reportable cyber incident goes to CERT-In within six hours of being noticed. Under DPDP, each affected person and the Data Protection Board must be told without delay, and the Board needs a detailed report within 72 hours. Sector regulators may have their own clock too.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Keep one page with every reporting clock that applies.
Example in BFSI

A partner API leak may need CERT-In in six hours, your regulator's report, and the DPDP messages.

What the law says

Section 8(6) and Rule 7 set the DPDP steps. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 set the six-hour report. A breach includes accidental disclosure and loss of access, not only hacking. Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Name one incident lead and a back-up, with phone numbers that work at night.
  2. Write the first-hour steps: isolate, preserve logs, tell the DPO and the incident lead.
  3. Keep ready-made drafts for CERT-In, the regulator, the Board and affected people.
  4. Decide in advance who signs off each message.
  5. Rehearse once a year with the people who would actually be called.
Evidence to keep
  • Incident plan with clocks
  • Rehearsal record
  • Incident log with times of each step
Common mistakes
  • Waiting to finish the investigation before telling anyone
  • Treating a wrong email or a lost laptop as 'not a breach'
  • Only IT knowing the plan

Do we need a Data Protection Impact Assessment?

Short answer: Required only for SDFs; good practice for high-risk changes

By law, only Significant Data Fiduciaries must do a yearly impact assessment. For everyone else it is good practice for high-risk changes: new tracking, profiling, large data sharing, children's data or moving data abroad. A short assessment before the change is cheaper than fixing it later.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Use impact assessments for high-risk changes even if you are not an SDF.
What the law says

Section 10 and Rule 13 require a yearly impact assessment for Significant Data Fiduciaries. Section 10 · Rule 13 · Section 9 · Rules 10, 12 · Section 16 · Rule 15

Steps
  1. Define what counts as a high-risk change for you.
  2. Use a two-page template.
  3. Record the data, purpose, risks and safeguards.
  4. Get the DPO's view before approval.
  5. Keep it with the project record.
Evidence to keep
  • Assessment template
  • Completed assessments
  • DPO views
Common mistakes
  • Treating it as paperwork after launch
  • A 40-page template nobody completes
  • No trigger list

How do we put DPDP into the risk register?

Short answer: One line per duty, with owner and evidence

Turn each duty into a risk line with an owner, a control, evidence and a review date. Map controls you already run for your regulator, auditors or certifications, so the same evidence serves several purposes. Track vendor risk separately.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Link each DPDP duty to your compliance calendar.
Example in BFSI

Link RBI IT governance and outsourcing controls as evidence.

What the law says

The Act sets duties in Sections 5 to 12. A risk register shows management where each duty stands. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 10 · Rule 13

Steps
  1. List the duties that apply to you.
  2. For each, write the risk in plain words, the control and the owner.
  3. Link existing controls and audits as evidence.
  4. Rate likelihood and impact in your usual way.
  5. Review every quarter with management.
Evidence to keep
  • Risk register extract
  • Linked evidence
  • Quarterly review minutes
Common mistakes
  • One line saying 'DPDP compliance'
  • No owners
  • Evidence that is only a policy document

The sections you will use most

Other rules that sit alongside DPDP

RuleWhat it saysWhat it means alongside DPDPSource
Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 and RBI KYC Master Direction, 2016Keep transaction records for at least five years from the transaction, and identity records for at least five years after the relationship ends.These periods override an erasure request. Explain the retention to the customer and stop every other use.RBI KYC Master Direction
RBI Master Direction on IT Governance, Risk, Controls and Assurance Practices, 2023In force from 1 April 2024 for commercial banks, larger NBFCs, credit information companies and all-India financial institutions. Requires IT governance under the board, audit trails, logging and incident reporting to CERT-In and RBI.Most of the DPDP security duty is already here. Map controls once and use the evidence for both.RBI
RBI Master Direction on Outsourcing of IT Services, 2023The regulated entity stays responsible for outsourced IT, with contracts, audit rights and exit plans.Line up DPDP processor contracts with this direction, so one schedule meets both.RBI
RBI direction on storage of payment system data, 2018All data relating to payment systems must be stored only in India.This is stricter than DPDP Section 16, and it continues to apply.RBI
RBI rules on card storage and tokenisation (from 1 October 2022)Only card issuers and card networks may store actual card data. Others use tokens, created with the cardholder's explicit consent.Check logs, call recordings and support tickets for card numbers.RBI
RBI (Digital Lending) Directions, 2025Collect only need-based data with prior explicit consent and an audit trail. Apps should not access contacts, files, media or call logs; one-time access to camera, microphone or location is allowed for onboarding or KYC with consent.Your app permissions and lending partner contracts are where DPDP and RBI meet.RBI
IRDAI Information and Cyber Security Guidelines, 2023Report cyber incidents to CERT-In within six hours, and to IRDAI within 24 hours of the CERT-In report.One incident plan should run the CERT-In, IRDAI and Data Protection Board steps together.IRDAI
SEBI Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF), 2024Security, logging and incident-reporting duties for SEBI-regulated entities. Stock brokers and depository participants report cyber incidents within six hours.Use CSCRF evidence for DPDP security, then add notices, consent and rights.SEBI
CERT-In Directions, 28 April 2022Report specified cyber incidents within six hours. Keep ICT logs for 180 days within India. Sync clocks to Indian time sources.Applies to every BFSI entity in addition to the regulator's own clock.CERT-In
Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005Governs what credit information is shared with credit bureaus and how errors are corrected.Credit bureau sharing has its own law; DPDP rights requests about bureau data should point to that process too.Act
RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme, 2021Customers can escalate unresolved complaints to the RBI Ombudsman.Privacy complaints may reach both the Ombudsman and the Data Protection Board. One complaint log helps.RBI
Explore our research-built assessment platformsDPDP Insights helps you understand the law. DPDPiq is where an organisation's evidence is assessed. Each platform comes out of the same Foundation Layer research. No AI, API or outside service is used when you use this site. Everything runs from InfraVeritas360's own server.