InfraVeritas360InfraVeritas360हिन्दीमराठीதமிழ்DPDPiq

DPDP Insights › Manufacturing › Chief compliance officer

DPDP for the Chief compliance officer in Manufacturing

Reviewed by InfraVeritas360 ResearchFirst published Last reviewed

Sources: DPDP Act, 2023 and DPDP Rules, 2025 (MeitY) · Ministry of Labour and Employment (PIB) · India Code; PRS summary · PIB · Kerala Factories and Boilers Department (copy of the Rules)

Your compliance calendar already carries the Labour Codes, the OSH Code, the chemical rules and, in fertilisers, the Fertiliser (Control) Order. DPDP adds duties owed to each worker, dealer, farmer and consumer.

Written for: Chief compliance officer, Manufacturing. Open this seat in the interactive tool

What is different here

Many records you keep are required by law, and Section 7 covers them, so the work is mapping, not starting again. Retention must follow the Codes and state rules for each record type. The truly new lines are notices, consent for loyalty and contests, people's requests and deletion when the purpose is over.

The first four things to sort out

  1. Add each DPDP duty to the compliance register with an owner.
  2. Map each record type to the law that sets its retention.
  3. Keep one page with the CERT-In six-hour and DPDP 72-hour steps.
  4. Log privacy complaints in one register that tracks the 90-day limit.

A worked example

Chief compliance officer

One register for plant compliance and DPDP

  1. Week 1Compliance lists DPDP duties next to the Labour Code, OSH Code, chemical rules and CERT-In items in the plant register.
  2. Week 2Medical examinations, registers and the on-site emergency plan already have evidence as legal duties. Notices, loyalty consent and people's requests have none.
  3. Week 4Owners are named for the open lines. The DPO attaches the gate notice and the loyalty sign-up screen.
  4. MonthlyThe compliance report to DPO / Management shows each DPDP line as tested, stated or open, plant by plant.

Evidence kept

  • Combined register
  • Evidence links
  • Monthly compliance report

Reuse safety and labour evidence where it fits, and say plainly which lines it does not cover.

What others in the sector usually do. Many compliance teams start by adding a DPDP column to the plant compliance register they already keep for {reg} and the safety inspectors.

Where it usually goes wrong, by organisation type

Organisation typeHotspots
Chemicals and petrochemicalsWorker health surveillance records; Hazardous goods driver and transporter records; Emergency plan contact lists shared with authorities
FertilisersFarmer Aadhaar authentication at retailer PoS; Farmer lists from meetings and agronomy apps; Dealer and retailer KYC records
Automotive and auto componentsConnected-vehicle location data; Dealer-shared buyer lists; Mechanic loyalty apps
FMCG and consumer goodsContest and promotion entries; Retailer app data; Agency-held consumer lists
Steel, metals and miningTownship and hospital records; Contract labour biometrics; Resettlement records
Cement and building materialsMason loyalty bank details; Driver records; Dealer KYC
Textiles and apparelAuditor access to worker files; Hostel records; Agency-held worker data
Food processing and dairyFarmer payment data; Collection centre registers; Consumer complaint records

10 questions the Chief compliance officer asks, answered in full

Farmer Aadhaar authentication at the retailer's PoS: who is responsible for what?

Short answer: The scheme flow is the government's; your own farmer programmes are yours

Subsidised fertiliser is sold through PoS devices at retailers, with Aadhaar-based farmer authentication on iFMS, a government platform built by NIC for the Department of Fertilizers. The scheme decides why farmer identity is collected in that flow. Your company sees sales data from it and supplies the retailers. Treat any farmer-level data you see as personal data, use it only for supply and subsidy work, and never for marketing. For your own farmer meetings, soil testing and agronomy apps, you are the Data Fiduciary with full duties. Get a written legal view on your role.

What the law says

Section 4 needs a lawful basis for each use. Section 6 needs consent for your own programmes. Section 8(1) and 8(5) apply to any data your staff, dealers or vendors handle for you. Section 4 · Section 6 · Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 5 · Rule 3

Steps
  1. Write down which farmer data you see from the scheme, and which you collect yourself.
  2. Limit company dashboards and exports to what supply and subsidy work needs.
  3. Remind dealers and retailers not to keep Aadhaar copies or note numbers in registers.
  4. Give a notice and ask consent in your own farmer apps and meetings.
  5. Keep scheme data and marketing data apart in your systems.
Evidence to keep
  • Written role view
  • Dashboard access list
  • Dealer circular
  • Farmer app notice and consent records
Common mistakes
  • Using scheme purchase data to target offers
  • Retailers keeping Aadhaar photocopies
  • Farmer meeting registers kept for ever

Contract workers, gate passes and biometrics: who is responsible for their data?

Short answer: You are, for data used at your plant; agencies act for you under contract

Your company decides why contract workers' data is collected at your plant: gate access, attendance, safety and the records the Labour Codes ask for. So for that data you are responsible, even when a manpower agency or contractor collects it. Agencies need a contract with data terms. Collect only what the gate and the law need, and delete biometric templates and photos when a worker leaves.

What the law says

Section 7 covers purposes of employment and duties under law. Section 8(1) keeps you responsible for processors. Section 8(7) asks for erasure when the purpose is over. Section 7 · Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8 · Section 5 · Rule 3

Steps
  1. List what is collected for each contract worker: ID, photo, biometric, bank details, medical fitness.
  2. Remove what the gate and the Labour Codes do not need.
  3. Give a short notice in the worker's language at enrolment.
  4. Add a data schedule to every agency and contractor contract.
  5. Delete templates and photos at exit; keep only the registers the law requires.
Evidence to keep
  • Enrolment field list with reasons
  • Notice in local languages
  • Signed agency data schedules
  • Exit deletion log
Common mistakes
  • Agencies keeping their own copies of Aadhaar cards
  • Templates of workers who left years ago
  • Worker lists shared with contractors on chat groups

Who owns accountability for personal data in practice?

Short answer: Named owners, accepted by them, for each duty

The organisation is accountable under the Act, and management decides who answers for each duty inside it. In practice that means a named owner for each duty and each major system, written down and accepted by that person. An owner whose name was typed in by someone else, without their agreement, is not really an owner.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Name an owner for every duty in one register approved by management.
What the law says

Section 8(1) puts responsibility on the Data Fiduciary. Section 8(9) asks for a published contact person. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Section 10 · Rule 13

Steps
  1. List duties and major systems.
  2. Propose an owner for each.
  3. Ask each owner to accept in writing.
  4. Publish the overall contact person.
  5. Review owners when people move.
Evidence to keep
  • Owner register with acceptances
  • Published contact
  • Review dates
Common mistakes
  • Owners assigned without telling them
  • One person owning everything
  • Owners who left the organisation

Can a policy show that a control actually works?

Short answer: No; operation needs records

No. A policy shows what an organisation intends. It does not show that the control runs. To show operation you need records: a deletion log, an access review sign-off, a drill report, a sample of requests answered on time. Auditors and regulators look for these.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. A policy is a starting point. Ask for the record that shows it working.
What the law says

Section 8(4) asks for appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance. Being able to show those measures work is part of meeting that duty. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. For each policy, write the record that would show it working.
  2. Check whether that record exists for the last quarter.
  3. Where it does not, start producing it.
  4. Sample a few records every quarter.
  5. Keep the samples with the policy.
Evidence to keep
  • Policy-to-record map
  • Quarterly samples
  • Gaps and actions
Common mistakes
  • Approving policies with no record behind them
  • Showing a policy when asked for evidence
  • Records that exist only before an audit

What should our privacy notice say, and where must people see it?

Short answer: Yes, at every point where you collect data

A notice must tell people, in plain words, what data you collect, why, how they can withdraw consent, how they can use their rights and how they can complain to the Data Protection Board. It has to stand on its own, separate from long terms and conditions, and be shown at the point where data is collected.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Keep a version history of every notice.
Example in Manufacturing

Gate pass forms, contract worker enrolment, the medical centre, dealer and mason app sign-ups and warranty cards each need a short notice, in the language people use.

What the law says

Section 5 and Rule 3 ask for a notice that can be understood on its own, with an itemised list of the data and the purpose for each item. Data you already hold from before the Act also needs a notice, as soon as reasonably practicable. Section 5 · Rule 3 · Section 6 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14

Steps
  1. List every point where personal data comes in: forms, apps, counters, calls, emails, partner feeds.
  2. Write one short notice per collection point, with the data items and purpose side by side.
  3. Add how to withdraw consent, how to make a request and the DPO or contact person's details.
  4. Offer the notice in English and in the languages your workers and customers actually use.
  5. Keep each version with the date it went live.
Evidence to keep
  • Screenshots or copies of the notice at each collection point, with dates
  • Notice version history
  • Translations, where used
Common mistakes
  • Hiding the notice inside terms and conditions
  • One notice for everything, with no link between data items and purposes
  • Forgetting old data collected before the Act

How do we handle a privacy complaint within 90 days?

Short answer: Reply within your published period, never beyond 90 days

Publish one clear way to complain, log every complaint, give it an owner and reply within the period you publish, never more than 90 days. People can go to the Data Protection Board only after using your process, so a good process keeps most matters with you.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Count the days on privacy complaints yourself.
Example in Manufacturing

Workers raise data concerns through supervisors and unions. Log them in the same register, within the 90-day limit.

What the law says

Section 8(10) requires a working grievance process. Rule 14(3) caps the reply time at 90 days. Section 13 says people must use your process before approaching the Board. Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Sections 18–26

Steps
  1. Publish one contact for privacy complaints on your website, app and notices.
  2. Log each complaint with the date, channel and a named owner.
  3. Acknowledge within a few days, and set an internal target well under 90 days.
  4. Find and fix the cause, not just the single case.
  5. Reply in writing and close the entry with the date.
Evidence to keep
  • Complaint register with dates
  • Replies sent
  • Monthly summary to management
Common mistakes
  • Mixing privacy complaints into general complaints with no tag
  • No owner, so nobody counts the days
  • Closing a complaint without fixing the cause

Something has gone wrong. What happens in the first 72 hours?

Short answer: Six hours for CERT-In; without delay for people and the Board; 72 hours for the detailed report

Contain it, then tell people. A reportable cyber incident goes to CERT-In within six hours of being noticed. Under DPDP, each affected person and the Data Protection Board must be told without delay, and the Board needs a detailed report within 72 hours. Sector regulators may have their own clock too.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Keep one page with every reporting clock that applies.
Example in Manufacturing

A stolen gate server or a lost medical register is a breach. CERT-In's six hours and the DPDP steps may both apply.

What the law says

Section 8(6) and Rule 7 set the DPDP steps. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 set the six-hour report. A breach includes accidental disclosure and loss of access, not only hacking. Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Name one incident lead and a back-up, with phone numbers that work at night.
  2. Write the first-hour steps: isolate, preserve logs, tell the DPO and the incident lead.
  3. Keep ready-made drafts for CERT-In, the regulator, the Board and affected people.
  4. Decide in advance who signs off each message.
  5. Rehearse once a year with the people who would actually be called.
Evidence to keep
  • Incident plan with clocks
  • Rehearsal record
  • Incident log with times of each step
Common mistakes
  • Waiting to finish the investigation before telling anyone
  • Treating a wrong email or a lost laptop as 'not a breach'
  • Only IT knowing the plan

Do we need a Data Protection Impact Assessment?

Short answer: Required only for SDFs; good practice for high-risk changes

By law, only Significant Data Fiduciaries must do a yearly impact assessment. For everyone else it is good practice for high-risk changes: new tracking, profiling, large data sharing, children's data or moving data abroad. A short assessment before the change is cheaper than fixing it later.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Use impact assessments for high-risk changes even if you are not an SDF.
What the law says

Section 10 and Rule 13 require a yearly impact assessment for Significant Data Fiduciaries. Section 10 · Rule 13 · Section 9 · Rules 10, 12 · Section 16 · Rule 15

Steps
  1. Define what counts as a high-risk change for you.
  2. Use a two-page template.
  3. Record the data, purpose, risks and safeguards.
  4. Get the DPO's view before approval.
  5. Keep it with the project record.
Evidence to keep
  • Assessment template
  • Completed assessments
  • DPO views
Common mistakes
  • Treating it as paperwork after launch
  • A 40-page template nobody completes
  • No trigger list

How do we put DPDP into the risk register?

Short answer: One line per duty, with owner and evidence

Turn each duty into a risk line with an owner, a control, evidence and a review date. Map controls you already run for your regulator, auditors or certifications, so the same evidence serves several purposes. Track vendor risk separately.

From your seat: Chief compliance officer. Link each DPDP duty to your compliance calendar.
Example in Manufacturing

Add agency, dealer network and plant system lines.

What the law says

The Act sets duties in Sections 5 to 12. A risk register shows management where each duty stands. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 10 · Rule 13

Steps
  1. List the duties that apply to you.
  2. For each, write the risk in plain words, the control and the owner.
  3. Link existing controls and audits as evidence.
  4. Rate likelihood and impact in your usual way.
  5. Review every quarter with management.
Evidence to keep
  • Risk register extract
  • Linked evidence
  • Quarterly review minutes
Common mistakes
  • One line saying 'DPDP compliance'
  • No owners
  • Evidence that is only a policy document

The sections you will use most

Other rules that sit alongside DPDP

RuleWhat it saysWhat it means alongside DPDPSource
Labour Codes (in force from 21 November 2025)The Code on Wages, 2019, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, the Code on Social Security, 2020 and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025. Together they rationalise 29 earlier labour laws.Worker and contract labour records now follow the codes and the rules under them. Set retention for these records against the codes and state rules, not against the old Acts.Ministry of Labour and Employment (PIB)
Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020Subsumes earlier Acts including the Factories Act, 1948 and the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. Requires a free annual health examination for employees where prescribed, licences for those hiring contract labour, and registers kept in the prescribed form, electronically or otherwise.Gate passes, attendance, contractor registers and medical checks are legal records. DPDP adds access limits, security and deletion when the legal period is over.India Code; PRS summary
OSH Code: workers in hazardous processesPre-employment, periodic and post-exposure medical examinations are mandatory. Health records are mandatory and accessible to employees and inspectors. Hazardous establishments need an on-site emergency plan and six-monthly mock drills.Health records are among the most sensitive data a plant holds. The worker and the inspector may see them; supervisors and the wider HR team should not.PIB
Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989Rule 13: the occupier prepares and keeps up to date an on-site emergency plan, with a mock drill every six months and the report made available to the Authority. Rule 14: the Authority prepares the off-site emergency plan. Rule 15: the occupier informs persons outside the site about the hazard and safety measures.Emergency plans carry names and phone numbers of staff, contractors and authorities. Share them because the law asks, keep them current, and remove people who have left.Kerala Factories and Boilers Department (copy of the Rules)
Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996Set up Central, State, District and Local Crisis Groups. The District Crisis Group reviews occupiers' on-site plans while preparing the district off-site plan. The Local Crisis Group prepares the local emergency plan for the industrial pocket, educates the population likely to be affected and answers public inquiries.Contact lists you give the crisis groups are shared for a legal duty. Send only what the plan needs, through a channel you can show.FAOLEX (text of the Rules)
Direct Benefit Transfer in fertilisers (Department of Fertilizers)Sale of all subsidised fertilisers to farmers and buyers is made through Point of Sale (PoS) devices at retail shops. Beneficiaries are identified through documents such as Aadhaar, Kisan Credit Card or Voter ID. Subsidy is released to fertiliser companies on the basis of actual sales by retailers to beneficiaries.Farmer identity and purchase data move through retailers and a government system. Your company sees part of it. Use what you see only for the scheme and supply work.Department of Fertilizers
Integrated Fertilizer Management System (iFMS)A pan-India digital platform developed by NIC for fertiliser DBT. It includes Aadhaar-based farmer authentication at PoS, captures transactions at manufacturing, import and retail points, and subsidy is released after a sale is recorded at the retailer level.iFMS is the government's system. Company dashboards and exports drawn from it still need access control and logs on your side.National Informatics Centre
Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985Dealers may sell only under an authorisation letter or certificate of registration (clauses 7 and 8). A retail dealer displays daily stock and prices (clause 4) and issues a cash or credit memo in Form M to the purchaser (clause 5). Records and returns in Form N are kept when the Controller directs (clause 35).Dealer authorisation papers and sale memos are dealer and farmer records. Your dealer KYC files and any farmer details on memos need the same care as other personal data.Government of Odisha (copy of the Order)
CERT-In Directions, 28 April 2022Report specified cyber incidents to CERT-In within six hours of noticing them. Keep logs of ICT systems for a rolling 180 days within India. Sync clocks to NIC or NPL time servers, or servers traceable to them.Applies to plants as well as head office. Keep this clock next to the DPDP breach steps in one plan.CERT-In
Explore our research-built assessment platformsDPDP Insights helps you understand the law. DPDPiq is where an organisation's evidence is assessed. Each platform comes out of the same Foundation Layer research. No AI, API or outside service is used when you use this site. Everything runs from InfraVeritas360's own server.