InfraVeritas360DPDPiq

DPDP Insights › Central government: ministries and departments › Scheme or programme head

Central government: ministries and departments

DPDP for the Scheme or programme head in Central government

As a scheme or programme head, you decide what data the scheme collects and who receives it.

Open this seat in the interactive tool

What is different here

Scheme guidelines often ask for more data than the benefit needs, and dashboards often show more than they should.

The first four things to sort out

  1. Check that every field collected is needed for eligibility or delivery.
  2. Mask names and Aadhaar on dashboards and published lists.
  3. Write data terms into state MoUs and integrator contracts.
  4. Give beneficiaries a contact for questions and corrections.

A worked example: A scheme head reviews the application form

  1. Week 1The form asks for 42 fields. The head asks the team to justify each.
  2. Week 211 fields are dropped, including religion and full bank statements.
  3. Week 3The revised form goes live with a short notice and contact.
  4. AfterThe dashboard masks names.

Evidence kept: Field justification; Revised form.

Every field you do not collect is one you never have to protect.

What others in the sector usually do. Scheme teams are reviewing forms field by field before the next guideline revision.

Where it usually goes wrong, by organisation type

Organisation typeHotspots
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways and its officesPort entry passes with ID copies held by many parties; Seafarer records shared with training institutes and agencies; Terminal operator systems outside the ministry's direct control
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and its officesBulk or API access by private entities; Accident and challan data; Toll and FASTag transaction data with vendors
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers and its departmentsAadhaar authentication at retailer PoS devices; Farmer purchase data visible to companies and dealers; Kendra operators holding prescriptions and customer details
Other line ministries and departmentsBeneficiary lists published or shared in spreadsheets; System integrators with admin access; Grievance records with personal details
Citizen portals and DBT schemesAadhaar numbers stored outside a data vault; Bulk beneficiary data sent to states by email; Dashboards showing names and amounts publicly
Regulators and statutory bodiesOrders and filings published with personal details; Complaint data shared with regulated entities; Investigation files on shared drives

10 guides for the Scheme or programme head, in full

Do we need citizens' consent to run a scheme?

Short answer: Usually not; Section 7(b) or 7(c) with Rule 5 standards

Usually not. Section 7(b) allows the State to process personal data to give a subsidy, benefit, service, certificate, licence or permit, and Section 7(c) covers functions under law. Rule 5 then asks that this processing meet the Second Schedule standards. Consent is still needed for uses outside these, such as publicity stories or surveys not tied to the scheme.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Your scheme guidelines decide the fields; review them.
What the law says

Section 7(b) and 7(c) set the bases. Rule 5 and the Second Schedule set the standards. Section 7 · Section 4

Steps
  1. Write the basis for each scheme: 7(b), 7(c) or consent.
  2. Check each scheme against the Second Schedule standards.
  3. Remove fields not needed for the benefit.
  4. Publish a contact for questions and rights.
  5. Take consent for extra uses.
Evidence to keep
  • Basis register
  • Standards check
  • Published contact
Common mistakes
  • Taking 'consent' that citizens cannot refuse
  • Collecting extra fields 'for analysis'
  • No contact for questions
Related questions

What do the Second Schedule standards ask of a scheme?

Short answer: Seven practical standards, each needing evidence

Process lawfully and only for the scheme's purpose, collect only the data needed, keep it accurate, keep it only as long as needed or required by law, protect it with reasonable safeguards, give people a contact for questions and rights, and be accountable for meeting these standards.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Fill in your scheme's checklist.
What the law says

Rule 5 and the Second Schedule apply to State processing under Section 7(b). Section 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(3)

Steps
  1. Field review: needed or not.
  2. Accuracy: how errors are corrected.
  3. Retention: which schedule applies.
  4. Security: who can access.
  5. Contact: published on the portal.
  6. Accountability: a named officer.
Evidence to keep
  • Standards checklist per scheme
  • Correction process
  • Retention schedule
Common mistakes
  • Treating standards as a formality
  • No correction route
  • No named officer
Related questions

How should scheme systems handle Aadhaar numbers?

Short answer: Vault, mask, never publish

Use Aadhaar only where a law or notification allows it, store the number only in an Aadhaar Data Vault, show it masked on screens and in reports, and never publish it. Core biometric information must never be shared. Authentication devices at the field level need vendor and operator controls.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Field devices and operators are part of your scheme.
What the law says

Aadhaar Act Sections 7 and 29 and UIDAI rules, with DPDP Section 8(5). Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 7

Steps
  1. Find every place Aadhaar numbers are stored.
  2. Move them to a vault with reference keys.
  3. Mask on screens, reports and files.
  4. Check PoS and field device vendors.
  5. Log access to the vault.
Evidence to keep
  • Vault design
  • Masking evidence
  • Access logs
Common mistakes
  • Aadhaar in spreadsheets
  • Full numbers on dashboards
  • Field operators keeping copies
Related questions

Can we share data with states, banks or other ministries?

Short answer: Yes, with a written basis, minimum fields and a log

Yes, where the scheme or a law needs it, through a written MoU or order that sets the purpose, the fields, security and retention. Share the minimum, through logged channels, and record each transfer. Bulk sharing with private parties needs a clear legal basis and should mask personal details where possible.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Approve the fields each partner gets.
What the law says

Section 7 bases, Section 8(1) for processors, Section 8(5) for safeguards. Section 7 · Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. List every outgoing data flow.
  2. Write an MoU or order for each.
  3. Cut fields to the minimum.
  4. Use logged channels.
  5. Review flows yearly.
Evidence to keep
  • Flow register
  • MoUs
  • Transfer logs
Common mistakes
  • Email attachments
  • Full data when counts would do
  • No MoU
Related questions

Staff share personal data on WhatsApp and personal email. What do we do?

Short answer: Yes, this is a common breach; give staff a safer option

Sending personal data to the wrong chat or a personal account is one of the most common breaches. Banning messaging rarely works. Give staff an approved tool that is easy to use, set simple rules, and make it safe to report a wrong send at once.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Your teams share data in the middle of real work. Make the approved way faster than the risky way.
In Central government

Government email and e-Office are the approved routes; WhatsApp groups are not.

What the law says

Section 8(5) asks for reasonable safeguards. A wrong send is a breach under Section 2(u), and Section 8(6) applies. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7

Steps
  1. Ask teams how they actually share files and photos today.
  2. Provide an approved tool for that job.
  3. Set three simple rules: approved tool, no personal accounts, report wrong sends.
  4. Teach the rules with real examples from your own work.
  5. Treat a quick report as good behaviour, not a disciplinary case.
Evidence to keep
  • Approved-tool policy
  • Training record
  • Incident reports of wrong sends
Common mistakes
  • A ban with no alternative
  • Punishing people who report
  • Ignoring group chats with vendors
Related questions

Someone asks what data we hold about them. What do we send?

Short answer: Yes, a clear summary, inside the published timeline

Send a summary of the personal data you hold about them and what you do with it, and the names of the other organisations you shared it with and what was shared. Check the person's identity first, log the request and keep a copy of your reply.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. People in your area hold data people may ask for. Know who logs a request and who searches.
In Central government

A beneficiary can ask what the department holds and who it was shared with, such as states and banks.

What the law says

Section 11 gives the right to a summary and the list of organisations it was shared with. Rule 14 asks you to publish how requests are made and to answer within the period you publish. Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14

Steps
  1. Log the request in one register the day it arrives.
  2. Verify identity using details you already hold.
  3. Search every system, including vendors' copies.
  4. Write a plain summary: what data, why it is used, who received it.
  5. Send it, and file the request, search notes and reply.
Evidence to keep
  • Request register
  • Search notes for each request
  • Copy of each reply with date
Common mistakes
  • Sending raw database dumps
  • Forgetting data held by vendors
  • No identity check before sending
Related questions

Something has gone wrong. What happens in the first 72 hours?

Short answer: Six hours for CERT-In; without delay for people and the Board; 72 hours for the detailed report

Contain it, then tell people. A reportable cyber incident goes to CERT-In within six hours of being noticed. Under DPDP, each affected person and the Data Protection Board must be told without delay, and the Board needs a detailed report within 72 hours. Sector regulators may have their own clock too.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Wrong sends and lost papers happen on your floor first. Make reporting quick and safe.
In Central government

A leaked beneficiary list is a breach; CERT-In and the Data Protection Board both need to hear.

What the law says

Section 8(6) and Rule 7 set the DPDP steps. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 set the six-hour report. A breach includes accidental disclosure and loss of access, not only hacking. Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Name one incident lead and a back-up, with phone numbers that work at night.
  2. Write the first-hour steps: isolate, preserve logs, tell the DPO and the incident lead.
  3. Keep ready-made drafts for CERT-In, the regulator, the Board and affected people.
  4. Decide in advance who signs off each message.
  5. Rehearse once a year with the people who would actually be called.
Evidence to keep
  • Incident plan with clocks
  • Rehearsal record
  • Incident log with times of each step
Common mistakes
  • Waiting to finish the investigation before telling anyone
  • Treating a wrong email or a lost laptop as 'not a breach'
  • Only IT knowing the plan
Related questions

Who needs DPDP training, and what should it cover?

Short answer: Everyone who handles personal data, by role

Everyone who handles personal data needs short, practical training on what to do in their own job. Front-line staff need examples from their counter or desk. Managers need to know the clocks and their own duties. Management needs to know what to ask.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Short sessions using your own daily examples work better than general training.
In Central government

Short sessions for section staff on files, e-Office and chat apps.

What the law says

Section 8(4) and 8(5) ask for appropriate technical and organisational measures. Training is part of showing those measures work. Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Group staff by what they handle: front line, back office, IT, managers, management.
  2. Write three to five real scenarios for each group.
  3. Keep sessions short: 20 to 30 minutes.
  4. Test with a few questions, and record attendance.
  5. Repeat every year, and at joining.
Evidence to keep
  • Training plan by group
  • Attendance and test results
  • Scenario material
Common mistakes
  • One long legal lecture for all
  • Training once and never again
  • No record of attendance
Related questions

What about CCTV, visitor registers and biometric attendance?

Short answer: Yes, with notice, limits and a deletion period

All three are personal data. Put a clear notice where people are recorded, collect only what you need at reception, keep footage and registers for a set period, and protect biometric templates carefully. Do not keep copies of ID documents unless you must.

From your seat: Scheme or programme head. Recording on your floor needs notices and limited viewing.
In Central government

Office CCTV and visitor passes need notices and limits.

What the law says

Section 5 needs notice. Section 8(5) needs safeguards. Section 8(7) needs erasure after the purpose. For staff, Section 7(i) can cover security and attendance. Section 5 · Rule 3 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8 · Section 7

Steps
  1. Put notices at CCTV points and reception, in the local language.
  2. Ask visitors only for name, phone and whom they are meeting, unless security needs more.
  3. Set a period for footage and registers, then delete.
  4. Restrict who can view footage, and log viewing.
  5. Check the vendor contracts for CCTV, guards and attendance systems.
Evidence to keep
  • Notices in place
  • Retention settings on the recorder
  • Viewing log
Common mistakes
  • Photocopying visitor IDs as routine
  • Footage kept until the disk fills
  • Biometric systems with vendor default passwords
Related questions

Practical examples

Notice wording, request log, retention schedule, vendor clause and breach notice for central government: ministries and departments.

The sections you will use most

Other rules that sit alongside DPDP

RuleWhat it saysWhat it means alongside DPDPSource
DPDP Act, Section 7(b) and 7(c) with Rule 5 and the Second ScheduleThe State may process personal data without consent to provide a subsidy, benefit, service, certificate, licence or permit, and to perform functions under law. Rule 5 asks that this processing follow the Second Schedule standards: lawful, for the stated use, limited to necessary data, accurate, kept only as long as needed, secured, and with a contact for questions and rights.Consent is not the basis for most scheme work. The standards are, and they need evidence.MeitY
DPDP Act, Section 17(4)For processing by the State, Section 8(7) (erasure) and Section 12(3) (erasure on request) do not apply, and where no decision affecting the person is made, Section 12(2) does not apply either.Retention follows public records rules rather than DPDP erasure. Security, accuracy, breach reporting and grievance duties still apply.MeitY
DPDP Act, Section 17(2)The Central Government may exempt notified instrumentalities for sovereignty, security, public order and related interests, and processing for research, archiving or statistics that does not lead to decisions about individuals.An exemption applies only if notified. Do not assume it.MeitY
RTI Act, Section 8(1)(j), as amended by DPDP Section 44(3) (in force 13 November 2025)Personal information is now exempt from disclosure under RTI, without the earlier public-interest test.Train CPIOs on the new wording; the amendment is being challenged before the Supreme Court, so watch for changes.SFLC.in summary
Public Records Act, 1993 and Public Records Rules, 1997Central government records may be destroyed only under approved record retention schedules.Erasure of personal data in files follows these schedules, since Section 17(4) lifts DPDP erasure for the State.National Archives of India
Aadhaar Act, 2016Section 7 allows Aadhaar for subsidies and benefits. Section 29 limits sharing of Aadhaar numbers and core biometric information. UIDAI asks entities storing Aadhaar numbers to keep them in an Aadhaar Data Vault.Scheme systems should store Aadhaar numbers only in a vault and show them masked.UIDAI
CERT-In Directions, 2022 and IT Act Section 70Report cyber incidents within six hours; keep ICT logs 180 days in India. Systems declared as protected systems under Section 70 come under NCIIPC.Ministries and their portals follow these in addition to DPDP.CERT-In
MeitY Email Policy and IT resources policy for GovernmentOfficial communication should use government email and approved resources.Personal email and chat apps for files with citizen data break both these policies and DPDP safeguards.MeitY
Guidelines for Indian Government Websites (GIGW)Government websites must carry standard policies, including a privacy policy.Update website privacy policies to DPDP notice standards with the contact person.MeitY / NIC
Explore our research-built assessment platformsEach one comes out of the same InfraVeritas360 Foundation Layer research. Human-led, with no AI used.