InfraVeritas360DPDPiq

DPDP Insights › Central government: ministries and departments › Internal audit and vigilance

Central government: ministries and departments

DPDP for the Internal audit and vigilance in Central government

Internal audit and vigilance see where data handling fails.

Open this seat in the interactive tool

What is different here

Audit findings on access, vendor control and record keeping are often also DPDP gaps.

The first four things to sort out

  1. Add data protection checks to internal audit programmes.
  2. Track vendor admin access as an audit item.
  3. Check record destruction against retention schedules.
  4. Report findings to the Secretary's office.

A worked example: Internal audit checks vendor admin access

  1. Week 1Audit finds 14 generic admin accounts used by the integrator.
  2. Week 2Finding reported with a 30-day deadline.
  3. Week 6Named accounts with MFA are in place.
  4. AfterMonthly access reports are reviewed.

Evidence kept: Audit finding; Closure evidence.

Generic admin accounts are the most common finding.

What others in the sector usually do. Internal audit teams are adding a DPDP section to IT audits.

Where it usually goes wrong, by organisation type

Organisation typeHotspots
Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways and its officesPort entry passes with ID copies held by many parties; Seafarer records shared with training institutes and agencies; Terminal operator systems outside the ministry's direct control
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and its officesBulk or API access by private entities; Accident and challan data; Toll and FASTag transaction data with vendors
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers and its departmentsAadhaar authentication at retailer PoS devices; Farmer purchase data visible to companies and dealers; Kendra operators holding prescriptions and customer details
Other line ministries and departmentsBeneficiary lists published or shared in spreadsheets; System integrators with admin access; Grievance records with personal details
Citizen portals and DBT schemesAadhaar numbers stored outside a data vault; Bulk beneficiary data sent to states by email; Dashboards showing names and amounts publicly
Regulators and statutory bodiesOrders and filings published with personal details; Complaint data shared with regulated entities; Investigation files on shared drives

10 guides for the Internal audit and vigilance, in full

What do the Second Schedule standards ask of a scheme?

Short answer: Seven practical standards, each needing evidence

Process lawfully and only for the scheme's purpose, collect only the data needed, keep it accurate, keep it only as long as needed or required by law, protect it with reasonable safeguards, give people a contact for questions and rights, and be accountable for meeting these standards.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Audit against the checklist.
What the law says

Rule 5 and the Second Schedule apply to State processing under Section 7(b). Section 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(3)

Steps
  1. Field review: needed or not.
  2. Accuracy: how errors are corrected.
  3. Retention: which schedule applies.
  4. Security: who can access.
  5. Contact: published on the portal.
  6. Accountability: a named officer.
Evidence to keep
  • Standards checklist per scheme
  • Correction process
  • Retention schedule
Common mistakes
  • Treating standards as a formality
  • No correction route
  • No named officer
Related questions

How should scheme systems handle Aadhaar numbers?

Short answer: Vault, mask, never publish

Use Aadhaar only where a law or notification allows it, store the number only in an Aadhaar Data Vault, show it masked on screens and in reports, and never publish it. Core biometric information must never be shared. Authentication devices at the field level need vendor and operator controls.

What the law says

Aadhaar Act Sections 7 and 29 and UIDAI rules, with DPDP Section 8(5). Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 7

Steps
  1. Find every place Aadhaar numbers are stored.
  2. Move them to a vault with reference keys.
  3. Mask on screens, reports and files.
  4. Check PoS and field device vendors.
  5. Log access to the vault.
Evidence to keep
  • Vault design
  • Masking evidence
  • Access logs
Common mistakes
  • Aadhaar in spreadsheets
  • Full numbers on dashboards
  • Field operators keeping copies
Related questions

Can we share data with states, banks or other ministries?

Short answer: Yes, with a written basis, minimum fields and a log

Yes, where the scheme or a law needs it, through a written MoU or order that sets the purpose, the fields, security and retention. Share the minimum, through logged channels, and record each transfer. Bulk sharing with private parties needs a clear legal basis and should mask personal details where possible.

What the law says

Section 7 bases, Section 8(1) for processors, Section 8(5) for safeguards. Section 7 · Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. List every outgoing data flow.
  2. Write an MoU or order for each.
  3. Cut fields to the minimum.
  4. Use logged channels.
  5. Review flows yearly.
Evidence to keep
  • Flow register
  • MoUs
  • Transfer logs
Common mistakes
  • Email attachments
  • Full data when counts would do
  • No MoU
Related questions

How do we put DPDP into the risk register?

Short answer: One line per duty, with owner and evidence

Turn each duty into a risk line with an owner, a control, evidence and a review date. Map controls you already run for your regulator, auditors or certifications, so the same evidence serves several purposes. Track vendor risk separately.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Split DPDP into separate duties. One line called 'DPDP compliance' hides where the risk actually is.
In Central government

Add data protection to internal audit and risk reviews.

What the law says

The Act sets duties in Sections 5 to 12. A risk register shows management where each duty stands. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 10 · Rule 13

Steps
  1. List the duties that apply to you.
  2. For each, write the risk in plain words, the control and the owner.
  3. Link existing controls and audits as evidence.
  4. Rate likelihood and impact in your usual way.
  5. Review every quarter with management.
Evidence to keep
  • Risk register extract
  • Linked evidence
  • Quarterly review minutes
Common mistakes
  • One line saying 'DPDP compliance'
  • No owners
  • Evidence that is only a policy document
Related questions

Something has gone wrong. What happens in the first 72 hours?

Short answer: Six hours for CERT-In; without delay for people and the Board; 72 hours for the detailed report

Contain it, then tell people. A reportable cyber incident goes to CERT-In within six hours of being noticed. Under DPDP, each affected person and the Data Protection Board must be told without delay, and the Board needs a detailed report within 72 hours. Sector regulators may have their own clock too.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Map every reporting clock that applies to you on one page: CERT-In, your regulator and the Data Protection Board.
In Central government

A leaked beneficiary list is a breach; CERT-In and the Data Protection Board both need to hear.

What the law says

Section 8(6) and Rule 7 set the DPDP steps. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 set the six-hour report. A breach includes accidental disclosure and loss of access, not only hacking. Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Name one incident lead and a back-up, with phone numbers that work at night.
  2. Write the first-hour steps: isolate, preserve logs, tell the DPO and the incident lead.
  3. Keep ready-made drafts for CERT-In, the regulator, the Board and affected people.
  4. Decide in advance who signs off each message.
  5. Rehearse once a year with the people who would actually be called.
Evidence to keep
  • Incident plan with clocks
  • Rehearsal record
  • Incident log with times of each step
Common mistakes
  • Waiting to finish the investigation before telling anyone
  • Treating a wrong email or a lost laptop as 'not a breach'
  • Only IT knowing the plan
Related questions

What must a vendor contract say about personal data?

Short answer: Yes, every vendor that touches personal data

You stay responsible for what your vendors do with personal data. The contract should say what data they get, for what purpose, the security they must keep, how fast they must tell you about an incident, that sub-contractors need your approval, and how data is returned or deleted at the end.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Vendor risk is usually the largest single item. Track the top vendors as separate risk lines.
In Central government

System integrators, NIC, state agencies and field operators process data for the department.

What the law says

Section 8(1) keeps responsibility with you. Section 8(2) allows a processor only under a valid contract. Rule 6 asks for security terms in that contract. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(7) · Rule 8

Steps
  1. List vendors who receive or can see personal data.
  2. Rank them by how much and how sensitive.
  3. Add a data-protection schedule to each contract, starting with the top ten.
  4. Ask for evidence: certificates, test results, deletion confirmations.
  5. Review the top vendors every year.
Evidence to keep
  • Vendor register
  • Signed data-protection schedules
  • Annual review notes
Common mistakes
  • Relying on the vendor's standard terms
  • No incident-notice time
  • No exit and deletion clause
Related questions

Could we be a Significant Data Fiduciary?

Short answer: Only by notification; none notified yet

Only the government can notify an organisation or a class of organisations as a Significant Data Fiduciary, based on the volume and sensitivity of data and the risk to people or the State. None had been notified when this page was last reviewed. Large holders of sensitive data should plan as if it could happen.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Keep notification as a scenario in the register, with a trigger and an owner.
In Central government

No government body had been notified as an SDF when this page was last reviewed. Large public data holders should prepare.

What the law says

Section 10 and Rule 13 set the extra duties: a DPO in India, an independent data auditor, a yearly Data Protection Impact Assessment and audit, and checks on algorithms. Rule 13(4) allows the government to restrict some data from leaving India. Section 10 · Rule 13 · Section 16 · Rule 15

Steps
  1. Estimate how many people's data you hold and how sensitive it is.
  2. Note any public or security role your data plays.
  3. If you are a likely candidate, run a trial impact assessment this year.
  4. Identify an auditor you could appoint.
  5. Watch MeitY notifications.
Evidence to keep
  • Volume and sensitivity note
  • Trial impact assessment
  • Board note
Common mistakes
  • Assuming 'not notified' means 'never'
  • Waiting for notification to start
  • Thinking only tech companies will be notified
Related questions

Can personal data be stored or accessed outside India?

Short answer: Yes, unless a sector rule says otherwise

Under DPDP, yes, unless the government restricts a country, and none had been restricted when this page was last reviewed. A sector rule can be stricter, for example RBI's rule that payment system data must be stored only in India. Remote support access from abroad also counts as data going outside India.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Record every system or support team outside India, and check each against sector localisation rules.
In Central government

Hosting is usually in India; check support access by vendors' overseas teams.

What the law says

Section 16 allows transfers unless restricted, and keeps stricter sector laws in force. Rule 15 adds conditions on making data available to foreign states. Section 16 · Rule 15 · Section 8(1)–(2)

Steps
  1. List where each system is hosted and where support teams log in from.
  2. Check sector rules for localisation.
  3. Put location and access terms in cloud and vendor contracts.
  4. Keep the list current; new SaaS tools change it quietly.
  5. Tell people in your notice if data goes abroad.
Evidence to keep
  • Hosting and access-location list
  • Contract clauses
  • Sector rule check
Common mistakes
  • Forgetting email, CRM and helpdesk SaaS
  • Ignoring overseas support logins
  • Assuming 'Indian vendor' means 'data in India'
Related questions

Does ISO 27001 or NIST CSF cover our DPDP duties?

Short answer: They cover security, not the whole Act

They help a great deal with the security part. ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0 are good evidence of reasonable security safeguards. They do not cover notice, consent, rights, complaints or children's data. ISO/IEC 27701 adds privacy controls, but no certificate replaces the Act.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Use existing certifications as evidence, but record the DPDP duties they do not cover as their own risk lines.
In Central government

NIC and CERT-In guidelines plus ISO 27001 for integrators cover much of Rule 6.

What the law says

Section 8(5) and Rule 6 ask for reasonable security safeguards. A recognised standard is strong evidence of that duty, and only of that duty. Section 8(5) · Rule 6

Steps
  1. Map your current controls to Rule 6.
  2. Add the DPDP-only items: notice, consent, rights, complaints, children, retention.
  3. Use the same evidence for audits and for DPDP.
  4. Include privacy in the scope of your next internal audit.
  5. Consider ISO/IEC 27701 if clients ask for it.
Evidence to keep
  • Control map
  • Audit reports
  • Gap list for DPDP-only items
Common mistakes
  • Treating a certificate as DPDP compliance
  • Scope that leaves out the systems with the most personal data
  • No owner for the non-security duties
Related questions

How much effort and time will it take to be ready by 13 May 2027?

Short answer: Six to nine months of steady work for most

For most organisations it is a programme of six to nine months, not a single project. The heavy parts are the data inventory, vendor contracts, access control and the request process. Notices, the contact person and training are lighter. Starting now leaves time to fix what you find.

From your seat: Internal audit and vigilance. Track the programme against dated milestones and report slippage early.
In Central government

Most effort goes into integrator contracts, access control and data flows.

What the law says

Most duties under the DPDP Rules start on 13 May 2027. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2) · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14

Steps
  1. Month 1: name the owner, set a budget line, start the inventory.
  2. Months 2 to 3: notices, consent records, contact person, request register.
  3. Months 3 to 6: vendor contracts, access control, logs, retention schedule.
  4. Months 6 to 8: breach rehearsal, training, internal review.
  5. Month 9: management review with evidence.
Evidence to keep
  • Programme plan with owners
  • Monthly status with evidence
  • Management minutes
Common mistakes
  • Leaving it to the last quarter
  • Buying a tool before knowing the gaps
  • Status colours with no evidence behind them
Related questions

Practical examples

Notice wording, request log, retention schedule, vendor clause and breach notice for central government: ministries and departments.

The sections you will use most

Other rules that sit alongside DPDP

RuleWhat it saysWhat it means alongside DPDPSource
DPDP Act, Section 7(b) and 7(c) with Rule 5 and the Second ScheduleThe State may process personal data without consent to provide a subsidy, benefit, service, certificate, licence or permit, and to perform functions under law. Rule 5 asks that this processing follow the Second Schedule standards: lawful, for the stated use, limited to necessary data, accurate, kept only as long as needed, secured, and with a contact for questions and rights.Consent is not the basis for most scheme work. The standards are, and they need evidence.MeitY
DPDP Act, Section 17(4)For processing by the State, Section 8(7) (erasure) and Section 12(3) (erasure on request) do not apply, and where no decision affecting the person is made, Section 12(2) does not apply either.Retention follows public records rules rather than DPDP erasure. Security, accuracy, breach reporting and grievance duties still apply.MeitY
DPDP Act, Section 17(2)The Central Government may exempt notified instrumentalities for sovereignty, security, public order and related interests, and processing for research, archiving or statistics that does not lead to decisions about individuals.An exemption applies only if notified. Do not assume it.MeitY
RTI Act, Section 8(1)(j), as amended by DPDP Section 44(3) (in force 13 November 2025)Personal information is now exempt from disclosure under RTI, without the earlier public-interest test.Train CPIOs on the new wording; the amendment is being challenged before the Supreme Court, so watch for changes.SFLC.in summary
Public Records Act, 1993 and Public Records Rules, 1997Central government records may be destroyed only under approved record retention schedules.Erasure of personal data in files follows these schedules, since Section 17(4) lifts DPDP erasure for the State.National Archives of India
Aadhaar Act, 2016Section 7 allows Aadhaar for subsidies and benefits. Section 29 limits sharing of Aadhaar numbers and core biometric information. UIDAI asks entities storing Aadhaar numbers to keep them in an Aadhaar Data Vault.Scheme systems should store Aadhaar numbers only in a vault and show them masked.UIDAI
CERT-In Directions, 2022 and IT Act Section 70Report cyber incidents within six hours; keep ICT logs 180 days in India. Systems declared as protected systems under Section 70 come under NCIIPC.Ministries and their portals follow these in addition to DPDP.CERT-In
MeitY Email Policy and IT resources policy for GovernmentOfficial communication should use government email and approved resources.Personal email and chat apps for files with citizen data break both these policies and DPDP safeguards.MeitY
Guidelines for Indian Government Websites (GIGW)Government websites must carry standard policies, including a privacy policy.Update website privacy policies to DPDP notice standards with the contact person.MeitY / NIC
Explore our research-built assessment platformsEach one comes out of the same InfraVeritas360 Foundation Layer research. Human-led, with no AI used.