DPDP for the Chief compliance officer in Central government

Usually not. Section 7(b) allows the State to process personal data to give a subsidy, benefit, service, certificate, licence or permit, and Section 7(c) covers functions under law. Rule 5 then asks that this processing meet the Second Schedule standards. Consent is still needed for uses outside these, such as publicity stories or surveys not tied to the scheme.

Section 7(b) and 7(c) set the bases. Rule 5 and the Second Schedule set the standards. Section 7 · Section 4

1. Write the basis for each scheme: 7(b), 7(c) or consent.
2. Check each scheme against the Second Schedule standards.
3. Remove fields not needed for the benefit.
4. Publish a contact for questions and rights.
5. Take consent for extra uses.

• Basis register
• Standards check
• Published contact

• Taking 'consent' that citizens cannot refuse
• Collecting extra fields 'for analysis'
• No contact for questions

No. Section 17(4) says the erasure duty in Section 8(7) and the erasure right in Section 12(3) do not apply to processing by the State. Retention follows public records rules and schedules. Correction rights and all other duties, including security and breach reporting, still apply.

Section 17(4) lifts DPDP erasure for the State. Public records rules govern destruction. Section 8(7) · Rule 8 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Section 8(3)

1. Apply record retention schedules.
2. Correct errors when asked.
3. Tell the citizen why data is kept.
4. Destroy records as the schedule allows.
5. Keep access limited while records are kept.

• Retention schedule
• Correction log
• Destruction register

• Thinking no duties apply
• Ignoring correction requests
• Keeping open access to old records

The organisation is accountable under the Act, and management decides who answers for each duty inside it. In practice that means a named owner for each duty and each major system, written down and accepted by that person. An owner whose name was typed in by someone else, without their agreement, is not really an owner.

Section 8(1) puts responsibility on the Data Fiduciary. Section 8(9) asks for a published contact person. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Section 10 · Rule 13

1. List duties and major systems.
2. Propose an owner for each.
3. Ask each owner to accept in writing.
4. Publish the overall contact person.
5. Review owners when people move.

• Owner register with acceptances
• Published contact
• Review dates

• Owners assigned without telling them
• One person owning everything
• Owners who left the organisation

No. A policy shows what an organisation intends. It does not show that the control runs. To show operation you need records: a deletion log, an access review sign-off, a drill report, a sample of requests answered on time. Auditors and regulators look for these.

Section 8(4) asks for appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance. Being able to show those measures work is part of meeting that duty. Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(1)–(2)

1. For each policy, write the record that would show it working.
2. Check whether that record exists for the last quarter.
3. Where it does not, start producing it.
4. Sample a few records every quarter.
5. Keep the samples with the policy.

• Policy-to-record map
• Quarterly samples
• Gaps and actions

• Approving policies with no record behind them
• Showing a policy when asked for evidence
• Records that exist only before an audit

For every use of personal data you need one basis: consent, or one of the legitimate uses in Section 7, such as a legal duty, employment, a medical emergency, or data a person gave voluntarily for a specific purpose. Anything beyond what the person expects, such as marketing, profiling or sharing with partners, usually needs consent.

Most scheme work rests on Section 7(b) or 7(c). Surveys, publicity and newsletters need consent.

Section 4 allows processing only with consent or for a legitimate use. Section 6 sets what valid consent looks like. Section 7 lists the uses that need no consent. Section 4 · Section 6 · Section 7

1. List each purpose for which you use personal data.
2. Against each purpose, write the basis: consent or the exact clause of Section 7.
3. Where the basis is consent, check that it was asked separately, with a clear action and no pre-ticked box.
4. Stop or re-paper any purpose with no basis.
5. Review the list whenever a new product, campaign or system starts.

• Purpose and basis register
• Consent records with date, version and channel
• Legal sign-off on each legitimate use relied on

• Treating account terms as consent for marketing
• Bundling several purposes in one tick-box
• Relying on 'legitimate interest', which the Indian Act does not have

A notice must tell people, in plain words, what data you collect, why, how they can withdraw consent, how they can use their rights and how they can complain to the Data Protection Board. It has to stand on its own, separate from long terms and conditions, and be shown at the point where data is collected.

A scheme portal should show what data is collected, why, and a contact for questions and corrections, even where consent is not the basis.

Section 5 and Rule 3 ask for a notice that can be understood on its own, with an itemised list of the data and the purpose for each item. Data you already hold from before the Act also needs a notice, as soon as reasonably practicable. Section 5 · Rule 3 · Section 6 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14

1. List every point where personal data comes in: forms, apps, counters, calls, emails, partner feeds.
2. Write one short notice per collection point, with the data items and purpose side by side.
3. Add how to withdraw consent, how to make a request and the DPO or contact person's details.
4. Offer the notice in English and in the languages your citizens and beneficiaries actually use.
5. Keep each version with the date it went live.

• Screenshots or copies of the notice at each collection point, with dates
• Notice version history
• Translations, where used

• Hiding the notice inside terms and conditions
• One notice for everything, with no link between data items and purposes
• Forgetting old data collected before the Act

Publish one clear way to complain, log every complaint, give it an owner and reply within the period you publish, never more than 90 days. People can go to the Data Protection Board only after using your process, so a good process keeps most matters with you.

Data complaints often arrive through CPGRAMS or the scheme helpline. Tag them.

Section 8(10) requires a working grievance process. Rule 14(3) caps the reply time at 90 days. Section 13 says people must use your process before approaching the Board. Section 8(9)–(10) · Rules 9, 14 · Sections 11–14 · Rule 14 · Sections 18–26

1. Publish one contact for privacy complaints on your website, app and notices.
2. Log each complaint with the date, channel and a named owner.
3. Acknowledge within a few days, and set an internal target well under 90 days.
4. Find and fix the cause, not just the single case.
5. Reply in writing and close the entry with the date.

• Complaint register with dates
• Replies sent
• Monthly summary to management

• Mixing privacy complaints into general complaints with no tag
• No owner, so nobody counts the days
• Closing a complaint without fixing the cause

Contain it, then tell people. A reportable cyber incident goes to CERT-In within six hours of being noticed. Under DPDP, each affected person and the Data Protection Board must be told without delay, and the Board needs a detailed report within 72 hours. Sector regulators may have their own clock too.

A leaked beneficiary list is a breach; CERT-In and the Data Protection Board both need to hear.

Section 8(6) and Rule 7 set the DPDP steps. The CERT-In Directions of 28 April 2022 set the six-hour report. A breach includes accidental disclosure and loss of access, not only hacking. Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 8(5) · Rule 6

1. Name one incident lead and a back-up, with phone numbers that work at night.
2. Write the first-hour steps: isolate, preserve logs, tell the DPO and the incident lead.
3. Keep ready-made drafts for CERT-In, the regulator, the Board and affected people.
4. Decide in advance who signs off each message.
5. Rehearse once a year with the people who would actually be called.

• Incident plan with clocks
• Rehearsal record
• Incident log with times of each step

• Waiting to finish the investigation before telling anyone
• Treating a wrong email or a lost laptop as 'not a breach'
• Only IT knowing the plan

By law, only Significant Data Fiduciaries must do a yearly impact assessment. For everyone else it is good practice for high-risk changes: new tracking, profiling, large data sharing, children's data or moving data abroad. A short assessment before the change is cheaper than fixing it later.

Section 10 and Rule 13 require a yearly impact assessment for Significant Data Fiduciaries. Section 10 · Rule 13 · Section 9 · Rules 10, 12 · Section 16 · Rule 15

1. Define what counts as a high-risk change for you.
2. Use a two-page template.
3. Record the data, purpose, risks and safeguards.
4. Get the DPO's view before approval.
5. Keep it with the project record.

• Assessment template
• Completed assessments
• DPO views

• Treating it as paperwork after launch
• A 40-page template nobody completes
• No trigger list

Turn each duty into a risk line with an owner, a control, evidence and a review date. Map controls you already run for your regulator, auditors or certifications, so the same evidence serves several purposes. Track vendor risk separately.

Add data protection to internal audit and risk reviews.

The Act sets duties in Sections 5 to 12. A risk register shows management where each duty stands. Section 8(1)–(2) · Section 8(5) · Rule 6 · Section 8(6) · Rule 7 · Section 10 · Rule 13

1. List the duties that apply to you.
2. For each, write the risk in plain words, the control and the owner.
3. Link existing controls and audits as evidence.
4. Rate likelihood and impact in your usual way.
5. Review every quarter with management.

• Risk register extract
• Linked evidence
• Quarterly review minutes

• One line saying 'DPDP compliance'
• No owners
• Evidence that is only a policy document